Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/antdigital-ai/agentic-ui/component-tool-usenpx skills add antdigital-ai/agentic-ui --skill component-tool-usegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/antdigital-ai/agentic-uiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/antdigital-ai/agentic-ui/component-tool-use)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/antdigital-ai/agentic-ui/component-tool-use"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/antdigital-ai/agentic-ui/component-tool-use.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00063 | $0.00316 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00158 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00063 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00032 |
Grade A, and why
component-tool-use scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
ToolUseBar / ToolUseBarThink 组件开发
工具调用与“思考中”状态展示条，用于在对话中呈现工具名称、参数、结果与耗时等。
源码位置
- 工具调用条：
src/ToolUseBar/index.tsx、src/ToolUseBar/BarItem.tsx - 思考条：
src/ToolUseBarThink/index.tsx
主要能力
- ToolUseBar：工具名称、状态、参数、结果、耗时（costMillis）等展示。
- ToolUseBarThink：思考中/加载状态条，常与思维链或 Bubble 配合。
开发规范
- 样式使用
createStyles与 token，支持classNames/styles。 - 事件与回调使用
on前缀。 - 与 Bubble、ThoughtChainList 等组件协同使用时，保持展示风格一致。
修改或扩展工具调用展示时，参考 src/ToolUseBar/、src/ToolUseBarThink/ 及 AGENTS.md。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 27 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A c54966fe4c36
component-tool-use is a skill published in the GitHub repository antdigital-ai/agentic-ui (224 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 316 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
hallmark
Anti-AI-slop design skill for greenfield pages, audits, redesigns, and design extraction from URLs or screenshots. Use when the user asks to build a new app or landing page, wants to redesign something, invokes Hallmark by name, or uses audit/redesign/study.
read
Reads URLs and PDFs by fetching source content, defaulting to concise summaries for plain read requests and clean Markdown when asked to convert, save, quote, cite, or feed downstream work. Use when users ask in any language to read, fetch, check, summarize, quote, cite, convert, or save a URL or PDF. Not for local…
accessibility
Consolidated accessibility skill entrypoint for WCAG 2.2, ARIA Authoring Practices, cognitive accessibility, Section 508, EN 301 549, design intent verification, and the Accessibility Planner workflow.
desktop-principles
Desktop-specific UX principles - hover states, pointer precision, keyboard shortcuts, multi-window, focus management. Covers macOS, Windows, Linux, web desktop.
taiyi-ui-design
TaiyiForge 第 4 阶段 — UI/UX 契约，产出 UI-DESIGN.md。四端通用。.
accessibility-analysis
服務可達性分析工具箱（accessibility / service coverage）。當用戶說「30km 路網可達」「最近 X 站」「服務範圍」「沙漠」「孤島」「等時圈」「isochrone」「可達性分析」「路網覆蓋」或要新增任何「離 POI 多遠」類型的分析時觸發。整合 mini-taiwan-pulse + taipei-gis-analytics 兩端 SOP，覆蓋三種視覺模式（路網染色 / Polygon 沿路網 / Hex 格點）、三套既有 reference pipeline 對照、模式選擇決策樹、常見坑（Overpass mirror 不穩 / pyrosm 爆 RAM / multi-bucket /…