Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add anthonysuherli/br8n --skill searchgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/anthonysuherli/br8nWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/anthonysuherli/br8n/search)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anthonysuherli/br8n/search"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anthonysuherli/br8n/search.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.00495 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.00247 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00099 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
search scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
br8n — Search
The primary verb. Answer the user's question from the session KB, and if the KB is thin on it, fill the gap online before answering. One skill, three moves: ground → grow → answer.
Step 1 — Ground
Follow ../_shared/preamble-first.md: resolve
project/kb from git, then mcp__plugin_br8n_br8n__br8n_resume(project, kb, query=<the user's question>). Show the banner + resume card. Note the coverage band.
Step 2 — Grow (conditional)
Branch on coverage for the question:
- rich → skip web research; the KB already covers it. Go to answer.
- sparse → the KB partially covers it. Decide if the gap is material to a
faithful answer. If yes, run a narrow
/br8n:explore(see../explore/SKILL.md) targeting only the thin slice; if no, answer from what's there and flag the soft spot. - gap → nothing to ground on. Either run
mcp__plugin_br8n_br8n__br8n_explore(project, kb, prompt=<question>)to gap-fill (blocks 1–3 min, then re-tap), or, if the user wants a fast answer, say the KB is empty on this and answer from general knowledge with that caveat.
Only grow when the gap actually blocks a good answer — don't explore reflexively.
Step 3 — Answer
Answer the user's question from the assembled context (resume card + any fresh findings). Cite which findings/snapshots grounded the answer. If you explored, the new findings are already persisted — mention the next resume will be richer.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 39 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A 33bb8c10775b
search is a skill published in the GitHub repository anthonysuherli/br8n (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 495 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
review
Validate plans, execution, or PRs against wish criteria — returns SHIP / FIX-FIRST / BLOCKED with severity-tagged gaps.
work
Execute an approved wish plan — orchestrate subagents per task group with fix loops, validation, and review handoff.
brainstorm
Explore ambiguous or early-stage ideas interactively — tracks wish-readiness and crystallizes into a design for wish.
wish
Convert an idea into a structured wish plan with scope, acceptance criteria, and execution groups for work.
report
Investigate bugs comprehensively — cascade through trace, capture browser evidence, extract observability data, and prepare or explicitly create a GitHub issue with grounded findings.
quick
Ship tiny low-risk changes to dev within one hour.