Claude for Financial Services is a collection of agents, skills, commands, plugins, and data connectors for investment banking, equity research, private equity, and wealth-management workflows. Financial professionals use it to draft models, memos, research notes, and reconciliations for review by qualified people. The catalogue contains components from these workflows, including agents, skills, plugins, commands, and instructions.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add anthropics/financial-services --skill nav-tieoutgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/anthropics/financial-servicesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/anthropics/financial-services/nav-tieout)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anthropics/financial-services/nav-tieout"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anthropics/financial-services/nav-tieout/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anthropics/financial-services/nav-tieout"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anthropics/financial-services/nav-tieout.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.00377 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00188 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00075 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00038 |
Grade A, and why
nav-tieout scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- nav-tieout — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
What it actually says
NAV tie-out
Given a generated LP statement and the period's NAV pack (via the nav MCP), independently recompute the LP's capital account and compare line by line.
The generated statement is the thing under test. The NAV pack is the source of truth.
Recompute the LP capital account
Beginning capital (prior statement ending)
+ Contributions (capital calls paid this period)
− Distributions (cash + in-kind)
+ Allocated net income / (loss)
= LP% × (realized + unrealized P&L − management fee − fund expenses)
− Carried interest allocation (if crystallized this period)
Ending capital
Pull each input from the NAV pack: LP commitment %, fund-level P&L components, fee and expense totals, waterfall outputs.
Compare
For each line on the statement, compare to your recomputed value. Tolerance: 0.01. For each mismatch, note which input drives it (e.g., "allocated P&L differs — statement used 12.40% ownership, NAV pack shows 12.38% after the Q1 transfer").
Additional checks
- Ending capital on this statement = beginning capital on next period's draft (if available).
- Sum of all LP ending capitals = fund NAV (within rounding).
- Commitment, unfunded, and recallable figures agree to the commitment register.
Output
A pass/fail per line, the recomputed values alongside the statement values, and a list of flags. Do not edit the statement — the publisher acts on the flags after review.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 39 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A e0811592d89f
nav-tieout is a skill published in the GitHub repository anthropics/financial-services (34,793 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 377 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
sector-rotation
An analysis framework for comparing industries in the Chinese A-share stock market, using business conditions, price momentum, valuation, and money flows. It produces rankings and higher- or lower-allocation suggestions.
strategy-pivot-designer
Detect backtest iteration stagnation and generate structurally different strategy pivot proposals when parameter tuning reaches a local optimum.
twitter-reader
Read Twitter/X for financial research using opencli (read-only). Use this skill whenever the user wants to read their Twitter feed, search for financial tweets, view bookmarks, look up user profiles, or gather market sentiment from Twitter/X. Triggers include: "check my feed", "search Twitter for", "show my…
chenhao-limit-up
A framework for judging Chinese A-share stocks that have reached the daily price-rise limit, using market mood, sector leadership, and trading momentum.
furusato
A Japanese hometown-tax donation manager for furusato nozei, a system where donations to municipalities can qualify for an income-tax or local-tax deduction. It reads donation receipts, stores donation records, and calculates deduction limits.
reading-receipt
An image-reading workflow for extracting structured information from receipts, invoices, and hometown-tax donation certificates. It can first extract text from PDFs and otherwise read their images.