Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add anylegal-ai/anylegal-oss --skill setupgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/anylegal-ai/anylegal-ossWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/anylegal-ai/anylegal-oss/setup)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anylegal-ai/anylegal-oss/setup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anylegal-ai/anylegal-oss/setup/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anylegal-ai/anylegal-oss/setup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anylegal-ai/anylegal-oss/setup.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.02525 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.01262 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00505 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00252 |
Grade A, and why
setup scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 213 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Workspace Setup
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- The user explicitly says
/setupor "set up my workspace" - The user asks "where do I start?" or similar first-time questions
list_documentsshows the workspace is empty or has no user files- The user wants to start fresh with a new workspace structure
Process
Step 0 — Check for existing content
Call list_documents before doing anything else.
If the workspace is empty (no files — empty system folders like Playbook/, Templates/, Skills/ don't count): skip this step entirely and go straight to Step 1.
If the workspace has user-created files (playbooks, anylegal.md, uploaded documents, user folders):
List what you found briefly, then ask:
"Your workspace already has content: [summarise what exists — folders, playbook files, etc.].
How would you like to proceed? (a) Add to it — I'll create any missing folders and update your Instructions, leaving existing files untouched (b) Start fresh — I'll clear out the old structure first, then set up a new one tailored to you (c) Cancel — leave everything as is"
Wait for the user's answer:
-
Add / supplement (a): proceed normally — create only what's missing, update anylegal.md
-
Start fresh (b):
⛔ DO NOT delete anything yet. First, show exactly what will be removed:
"Before I clear anything, here's what I'll delete: [list each user-created folder and file found by list_documents] Note: The Playbook/ folder itself is always kept, but its files and subfolders will be removed. Skills/ is never touched. Confirm: delete all of the above? (yes / no / adjust the list)"
Wait for an explicit "yes" before calling any delete tool. If the user says no or wants to adjust, revise the list and ask again. Only after confirmation, delete in this order:
- Playbook subfolders:
delete_folder("Playbook/India/"),delete_folder("Playbook/Singapore/"), etc. - Playbook files:
delete_document("Playbook/ndas.md"),delete_document("Playbook/positions.md"), etc. - Templates files:
delete_document("Templates/some-file.txt")— delete files individually, NOT the folder - User top-level folders:
delete_folder("Clients/"),delete_folder("Resources/"), etc. delete_document("anylegal.md")
- Playbook subfolders:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 213 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A 7e5fec658620
setup is a skill published in the GitHub repository anylegal-ai/anylegal-oss (11 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 2,525 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…