Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add anysiteio/agent-skills --skill anysite-crm-enrichgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/anysiteio/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/anysiteio/agent-skills/anysite-crm-enrich)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anysiteio/agent-skills/anysite-crm-enrich"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anysiteio/agent-skills/anysite-crm-enrich/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anysiteio/agent-skills/anysite-crm-enrich"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anysiteio/agent-skills/anysite-crm-enrich.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00116 | $0.01757 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00058 | $0.00879 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00351 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00176 |
Grade A, and why
anysite-crm-enrich scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 127 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CRM Enrich
Fill gaps in existing CRM records with anysite data. The most common flow: pull a list from the CRM, enrich only what is missing, write back only to mapped fields.
Prerequisites
crm_list_connections→ anactiveconnection. Missing → send the user to/anysite-crm-setup(or Profile → CRM Integration in the dashboard).- The
anysite-crm-profileskill exists → its mapping is law. Missing → minimal safe mode: standard properties only, recommend running setup. - Read the Writing rules in
anysite-crm-setup— they apply to every write below.
Flow
1. Scope — what to enrich
Ask (or infer from the request): which records and which fields. Pull them:
crm_query_records(object_type="contacts", list_id=<working list> | search=... | emails=[...],
properties=[record_id + match keys + mapped target fields])
Page through everything in scope. Locally split records into:
- complete — all mapped target fields filled → skip (report count),
- enrichable — has a match key (email / linkedin_url / domain) and gaps,
- unmatchable — no key at all → report, do not guess identities.
2. Resolve identities (contacts)
- Has
linkedin_url→execute linkedin/user/user(full profile: title, company, location). - Only email → try reverse lookup first:
execute linkedin/email/email_sql_user(cached, cheap) → remainder viaemail_user(live). Both take ONE email per call — loop, don't batch, and expect misses (verified to return empty even for people who are on LinkedIn). Then the cascade that actually works, because the CRM knows the name: email domain → resolve company (verified, per anysite-mcp recipe) →organizational_urn→search_users {first_name, last_name, current_company: [{"type": "company", "value": "<id>"}]}→ usually exactly one match, WITH the profile URN as a bonus. Company filter mandatory — bare names return namesakes. On BIG batches, do the same cheaper in one call:search_sql_users {last_name: [...], current_company_domain: [<email domains>], count}resolves many name+domain pairs at DB cost (then live-verify what you'll write). Still nothing → leave record, report. - Needs email → cascade:
user_email(batch ≤10, cheap, low yield, a MIX of personal and work addresses incl. past employers — group by profile, match domain to current company) → remainder viauser_find_email_by_url {url: <vanity profile URL>}(50cr each — estimate cost on large lists first). Checkvalid_email/email_statusin its response and write only addresses that pass; report the rest as "found, unverified".
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 127 lines · 116 tokens per session scan A 028a9615667a
anysite-crm-enrich is a skill published in the GitHub repository anysiteio/agent-skills (19 stars, last pushed 28d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 116 tokens to every session and 1,757 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…