Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add anysiteio/agent-skills --skill anysite-crm-scoregit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/anysiteio/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/anysiteio/agent-skills/anysite-crm-score)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anysiteio/agent-skills/anysite-crm-score"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anysiteio/agent-skills/anysite-crm-score/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anysiteio/agent-skills/anysite-crm-score"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anysiteio/agent-skills/anysite-crm-score.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00081 | $0.01270 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00041 | $0.00635 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00254 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00127 |
Grade A, and why
anysite-crm-score scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 94 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CRM Score
Deterministic-ish prioritization: explicit rubric, evidence per company, score written to exactly one mapped field.
Prerequisites
Active CRM connection. Profile must map a score target field with mode: overwrite
(scores are re-computed by design). Not mapped → offer to store nothing and just report,
or send the user to re-run /anysite-crm-setup. The Writing rules in anysite-crm-setup
apply to every write. Cap a scoring run at ~50 companies and state the credit estimate
(evidence calls × price) before fetching; more → propose tiers or a narrower list.
Flow
1. Fix the rubric BEFORE fetching data
Get ICP criteria from the user, or derive them with anysite-crm-lookalikes logic from
closed-won records. Turn them into a written rubric with weights, e.g.:
industry match (0-3), size band (0-2), geo (0-1), funding stage (0-2),
hiring in buyer function (0-1), tech/context signal (0-1) → 0-10
Show the rubric, get a nod. The rubric goes into the report verbatim — scores must be explainable and reproducible.
2. Fetch evidence (cheap-first)
crm_query_records(object_type="companies", ...) → record_id, name, domain, existing fields
- Base firmographics:
search_sql_companiesbywebsite— default one domain per call; OR-DSL batching ({website: "a.com|b.com|...", count: 10× domains}) is an optimization with a verification tax (see the anysite-mcp resolve recipe). Nevercount: 1— the search is substring match, and a common-token domain comes back with only look-alikes even in a single-domain call. Verify the exactwebsitematch per domain viaquery_cachewith an explicitlimit(default is 10 — a 20-domain batch needs more). Unverified match = no evidence, score that criterion "unknown"; a domain that never comes back exact-matched is resolved viawebparser/parseon the site itself, per the same recipe. - Stage/funding (only if the rubric needs it): take the alias from
crunchbase_link, which the domain-resolve above ALREADY returned — free, no lookup. Only when it is empty and the company is plausibly venture-backed, fall back to the livecrunchbase/search(20cr, fuzzy — verify name+domain) →crunchbase/company. Skip entirely for obviously non-venture companies. Noteleadership_hires[]is unusable as an ICP criterion for SMB/startup targets — measured empty on 6 of 6 live accounts, including a 281-person one. - Hiring probe (only if in rubric): prefer the numeric id from
organizational_urnof the domain-resolve you already did →search_jobs {company: [{"type": "company", "value": "<id>"}], count: 20}. No resolve →search_companies {keywords: name, count: 5}+ verify by name/industry (itsurnis already the{type, value}object). - Team-shape evidence (great for "engineering-led vs sales-led" criteria):
linkedin/company/company_employee_stats(1cr, needs company URN) — absolute headcounts by function (verified: Engineering 26 / Sales 14 on a 79-person company). Don't sum itslocationsarray (nested buckets: US ⊃ state ⊃ metro); cross-check totals againstemployee_count.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 94 lines · 81 tokens per session scan A d76e41686bcd
anysite-crm-score is a skill published in the GitHub repository anysiteio/agent-skills (19 stars, last pushed 28d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 81 tokens to every session and 1,270 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…