Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/ao92265/claude-code-playbook/explainnpx skills add ao92265/claude-code-playbook --skill explaingit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ao92265/claude-code-playbookWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ao92265/claude-code-playbook/explain)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ao92265/claude-code-playbook/explain"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ao92265/claude-code-playbook/explain.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00090 | $0.00724 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00045 | $0.00362 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00145 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00072 |
Grade A, and why
explain scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 78 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Explain Code
Provide a layered explanation that starts simple and goes deeper on request.
Steps
-
Identify the target:
- Read the file, function, class, or concept the user wants explained
- If the target is vague ("explain the auth system"), identify the entry point and core files
-
Layer 1 — One-liner:
- Explain what it does in a single sentence
- Focus on the what, not the how
- Example: "This function validates JWT tokens and attaches the decoded user to the request."
-
Layer 2 — How it works (5-10 lines):
- Walk through the high-level flow
- Name the key steps without implementation details
- Mention inputs, outputs, and side effects
- Example: "It extracts the token from the Authorization header, verifies the signature using the secret from env, checks expiration, looks up the user in the database, and attaches them to
req.user."
-
Layer 3 — Implementation details (on request):
- Walk through the code line by line or block by block
- Explain why specific approaches were chosen
- Point out error handling, edge cases, and guard clauses
- Reference related files, types, or functions
-
Layer 4 — Context and connections (on request):
- How this code fits into the larger system
- What depends on it (callers, consumers)
- What it depends on (services, libraries, config)
- Historical context if visible from git blame or comments
-
Adapt to the reader:
- If the user seems experienced: skip basics, focus on non-obvious behavior
- If the user seems new: use analogies, avoid jargon, explain prerequisites
- If unclear: default to Layer 2 and offer to go deeper
Output Format
**What it does:** [one-liner]
**How it works:**
1. [step]
2. [step]
3. [step]
**Key details:**
- [non-obvious behavior or edge case]
- [important dependency or assumption]
Want me to go deeper on any part?
Important
- Start simple, go deep on request. Don't dump implementation details when the user just wants to understand the purpose.
- Use the user's language. If they say "the login thing," use that phrase — don't correct them with "the OAuth2 authentication middleware."
- Point out the non-obvious. The obvious parts are already in the code. Explain the why, the edge cases, and the gotchas.
- Be honest about uncertainty. If the code is unclear or you're guessing at intent, say so.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 78 lines · 90 tokens per session scan A 2d572e2e3d9f
explain is a skill published in the GitHub repository ao92265/claude-code-playbook (10 stars, last pushed 18d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 90 tokens to every session and 724 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
hr-onboarding
A new-hire onboarding plan as a single page — first week schedule, buddy + manager intro, learning track, equipment checklist, and "you're set when…" outcomes. Use when the brief mentions "onboarding", "new hire", "first week plan", or "入职".
book-mirror
Take any book (EPUB/PDF), produce a personalized chapter-by-chapter analysis. Each chapter is preserved in detail (The Chapter) and mirrored back to the reader's actual life (The Mirror) using brain context. The mirror observes and resonates — a friend pointing out parallels, NOT a consultant rearranging the reader's…
miniapp
Build a tiny interactive HTML playground only when someone asks to see, play with, or step through a mechanism.
eli5
Explain research, papers, or technical ideas in plain English with minimal jargon, concrete analogies, and clear takeaways. Use when the user says "ELI5 this", asks for a simple explanation of a paper or research result, wants jargon removed, or asks what something technically dense actually means.
deck-course-module
暖纸背景 + Playfair, 左侧学习目标常驻, 含 MCQ 自测页.
best-practices
Searchable knowledge base of 152+ programming best practices across 30+ languages and frameworks. BM25-powered search over curated resources from industry leaders (Google, Airbnb, Uber, Mozilla, Shopify, OWASP).