Apache Struts is an open-source Java web framework that helps developers build applications using the Model-View-Controller pattern, separating data and business logic from page presentation and request handling. Java developers use it to create dynamic web applications with interactive forms and database-backed behavior. The catalogue's skills, instructions, and setting support work with Struts projects.
Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to apache/struts. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/struts/main/.github/skills/code-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/apache/strutsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/apache/struts/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/apache/struts/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/apache/struts/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/apache/struts/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/apache/struts/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.01576 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00630 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00315 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00158 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 137 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Reviewing Apache Struts pull requests
Apache Struts is a mature MVC framework for Java. It uses OGNL for value stack expressions and FreeMarker for UI tag templates, and it has a long history of security vulnerabilities in exactly those areas. Review accordingly: the conventions below are not style preferences, they are the places where changes tend to go wrong in this codebase.
Deeper references, when a review needs them:
CLAUDE.md— build commands, test style (JUnit 3 vs 4), PR conventionsSECURITY.md— the vulnerability reporting process (source of truth)THREAT_MODEL.md— scope, trust boundaries, known non-findingsAGENTS.md— rules for AI agents working on security findings
1. Tests
This repository is JUnit 4. There is no JUnit 5 anywhere in it.
parent/pom.xml declares junit:junit:4.13.2; there are zero
org.junit.jupiter imports. Two styles coexist and a new test must match the
style already in the file it joins:
- JUnit 3 style — classes extending
XWorkTestCase, which extendsjunit.framework.TestCase. Test methods must be namedtestXxx(). A Jupiter@Testannotation added to one of these silently never runs — it does not fail, it is simply not collected. Flag this as blocking whenever you seeorg.junit.jupiterin a diff. - JUnit 4 style — classes using
import org.junit.Test.
Both styles are widespread and neither is being migrated away from.
AssertJ assertions and Mockito mocks are both available and widely used.
Introducing JUnit 5 is a build-infrastructure change that needs its own WW-
ticket; it is never a side effect of a feature PR.
Tests that pass without testing anything
Three traps in this codebase produce green tests that assert nothing. Check for them whenever a PR adds a test in these areas:
- Unpushed action. An action object that was never pushed onto the value stack binds no parameters at all, so an assertion that "the parameter was not bound" passes for the wrong reason. Confirm the fixture pushes the action.
requireAnnotationsis off by default in a bare harness.ParametersInterceptor.requireAnnotationsis a Java field initialised tofalse; production turns it on throughstruts.parameters.requireAnnotations=trueindefault.properties. A test that constructs the interceptor directly and expects an unannotated parameter to be rejected will pass with the check disabled. The test must set the flag.- Interned string literals defeat identity checks. Where the framework
compares against a marker constant with
==, a String literal in a test is interned to the same instance as the constant, so the test passes vacuously even against unfixed code. Such fixtures must build the value at runtime, with anassertNotSameguard proving they did.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed 9a992d4bbff6
- 1mo ago First seen · 137 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A d86179ddb12f
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository apache/struts (1,371 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 1,576 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
pr-review
Review of a PR, branch, or your own uncommitted work across eight dimensions — security, correctness, test coverage, API/compatibility, usability, documentation, code quality, performance. Sizes the diff, reviews inline or fans out reviewers off a shared brief, verifies findings against code, reports a grouped list…
code-review
Perform a pedantic, multi-perspective code review on the current diff or git changes against the styleguide and software engineering best practices.
cleanup-code-inspections
Reduce technical debt and improve code quality by systematically resolving static analysis warnings.
plugin-code-review-orchestrated
Orchestrates a code review of the spring-plugin repository through scope/context passes, routing, domain reviewer subskills, and per-artifact validation. Use when asked to review a PR, diff, commit, branch, module, or file set, to run a full orchestrated review, or to produce a validated review report.
review-async-lifecycle
Normative reviewer for EDT safety, coroutines, cancellation, read/write actions, disposal, listeners and async lifecycle in the explyt spring-plugin. Use during orchestrated code review when the diff touches threading, background tasks, read or write actions, listeners, MessageBus, Disposable ownership or progress…
review-core-correctness
Normative mandatory reviewer for correctness, contracts, architecture sanity, UX behavior, code quality and tests in the explyt spring-plugin codebase. Use during orchestrated code review of a PR, diff, commit or branch, or when asked to review correctness, logic, architecture or test coverage of plugin changes.