code-review

code-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from apache/struts. It costs 41 tokens per session (1,569 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A pull-request review guide tailored to Apache Struts, a Java web framework with security-sensitive request and expression-handling code.

In plain words
What is it for?
Reviewing Struts pull requests, checking JUnit 4 tests, assessing security-sensitive changes, and verifying pull-request and commit hygiene.
Why use it?
It highlights project-specific testing, security, and commit practices that general review checklists may miss.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

About the project

Apache Struts is an open-source Java web framework that helps developers build applications using the Model-View-Controller pattern, separating data and business logic from page presentation and request handling. Java developers use it to create dynamic web applications with interactive forms and database-backed behavior. The catalogue's skills, instructions, and setting support work with Struts projects.

apache/struts · 1,366 stars · on GitHub

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/apache/struts/code-review
Any agent
npx skills add apache/struts --skill code-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/apache/struts

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for code-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/apache/struts/code-review.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/apache/struts/code-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/apache/struts/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/apache/struts/code-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 41 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,569 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00041 $0.01569
Opus 5 $0.00020 $0.00785
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00314
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00157

Measured yesterday against content hash d86179ddb12f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.github/skills/code-review/SKILL.md · 137 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 137 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Reviewing Apache Struts pull requests

Apache Struts is a mature MVC framework for Java. It uses OGNL for value stack expressions and FreeMarker for UI tag templates, and it has a long history of security vulnerabilities in exactly those areas. Review accordingly: the conventions below are not style preferences, they are the places where changes tend to go wrong in this codebase.

Deeper references, when a review needs them:

  • CLAUDE.md — build commands, module layout, request lifecycle
  • SECURITY.md — the vulnerability reporting process (source of truth)
  • THREAT_MODEL.md — scope, trust boundaries, known non-findings
  • AGENTS.md — rules for AI agents working on security findings

1. Tests

This repository is JUnit 4. There is no JUnit 5 anywhere in it. parent/pom.xml declares junit:junit:4.13.2; there are zero org.junit.jupiter imports. Two styles coexist and a new test must match the style already in the file it joins:

  • JUnit 3 style — classes extending XWorkTestCase, which extends junit.framework.TestCase. Test methods must be named testXxx(). A Jupiter @Test annotation added to one of these silently never runs — it does not fail, it is simply not collected. Flag this as blocking whenever you see org.junit.jupiter in a diff.
  • JUnit 4 style — classes using import org.junit.Test.

Both styles are widespread and neither is being migrated away from.

AssertJ assertions and Mockito mocks are both available and widely used. Introducing JUnit 5 is a build-infrastructure change that needs its own WW- ticket; it is never a side effect of a feature PR.

Tests that pass without testing anything

Three traps in this codebase produce green tests that assert nothing. Check for them whenever a PR adds a test in these areas:

  • Unpushed action. An action object that was never pushed onto the value stack binds no parameters at all, so an assertion that "the parameter was not bound" passes for the wrong reason. Confirm the fixture pushes the action.
  • requireAnnotations is off by default in a bare harness. ParametersInterceptor.requireAnnotations is a Java field initialised to false; production turns it on through struts.parameters.requireAnnotations=true in default.properties. A test that constructs the interceptor directly and expects an unannotated parameter to be rejected will pass with the check disabled. The test must set the flag.
  • Interned string literals defeat identity checks. Where the framework compares against a marker constant with ==, a String literal in a test is interned to the same instance as the constant, so the test passes vacuously even against unfixed code. Such fixtures must build the value at runtime, with an assertNotSame guard proving they did.

Read the full file on GitHub · 137 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 137 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A d86179ddb12f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository apache/struts (1,366 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 1,569 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

tika-eval-compare

Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".

apache/tika · 50 tokens

azure-security-keyvault-secrets-java

Azure Key Vault Secrets Java SDK for secret management. Use when storing, retrieving, or managing passwords, API keys, connection strings, or other sensitive configuration data.

microsoft/skills · 40 tokens

azure-ai-anomalydetector-java

Build anomaly detection applications with Azure AI Anomaly Detector SDK for Java. Use when implementing univariate/multivariate anomaly detection, time-series analysis, or AI-powered monitoring.

microsoft/skills · 43 tokens

azure-communication-chat-java

Build real-time chat applications with Azure Communication Services Chat Java SDK. Use when implementing chat threads, messaging, participants, read receipts, typing notifications, or real-time chat features.

microsoft/skills · 41 tokens

union-type-wrappers

Add typed getters and setters over BinaryData properties that represent TypeSpec union types in generated Java models. Use when generated classes expose BinaryData for union-typed fields and you need ergonomic, type-safe accessors instead.

Azure/azure-sdk-for-java · 49 tokens

azure-ai-agents-persistent-java

Azure AI Agents Persistent SDK for Java. Low-level SDK for creating and managing AI agents with threads, messages, runs, and tools. Triggers: "PersistentAgentsClient", "persistent agents java", "agent threads java", "agent runs java", "streaming agents java".

microsoft/skills · 63 tokens