integration-testing

integration-testing is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from ApexIQ/skillsmith. It costs 26 tokens per session (577 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A guide to checking that a complete application works correctly across its frontend and backend. It covers API contract tests and end-to-end tests, which simulate real user journeys.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to test flows such as logging in, opening a dashboard, completing a purchase, and logging out, along with the API responses behind them.
Why use it?
It catches mismatched data, broken user flows, network failures, timeouts, and loading-state problems that isolated tests may miss.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to test flows such as logging in, opening a dashboard, completing a purchase, and logging out, along with the API responses behind them.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/apexiq/skillsmith/integration_backend_frontend_best_practices
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add ApexIQ/skillsmith --skill integration_backend_frontend_best_practices
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ApexIQ/skillsmith

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for integration-testing

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/apexiq/skillsmith/integration_backend_frontend_best_practices/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/apexiq/skillsmith/integration_backend_frontend_best_practices)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/apexiq/skillsmith/integration_backend_frontend_best_practices"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/apexiq/skillsmith/integration_backend_frontend_best_practices/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for integration-testing

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/apexiq/skillsmith/integration_backend_frontend_best_practices"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/apexiq/skillsmith/integration_backend_frontend_best_practices.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 26 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 577 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00026 $0.00577
Opus 5.5 $0.00010 $0.00231
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00005 $0.00115
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00058

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 4216c99657fa, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

integration-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agent/skills/integration_backend_frontend_best_practices/SKILL.md · 71 lines

What it actually says

🔗 Integration Testing Best Practices

Goal: Ensure the "Handshake" between frontend and backend never breaks.

1. The Integration Pyramid

  1. Contract Tests:
    • Verify API response shape matches frontend expectations.
    • Use schema validation (Zod, Yup) on frontend to catch mismatches early.
  2. Flow Tests (E2E):
    • Simulate full user journeys: Login -> Dashboard -> Action -> Logout.
    • Tools: Playwright, Cypress, Puppeteer.

2. API Contract Strategy

  • Single Source of Truth:
    • Backend defines schemas (Pydantic, Zod).
    • Generate frontend types from OpenAPI/JSON Schema.
    • Never manually duplicate type definitions.

3. Testing Failure Scenarios

  • Network Errors: What happens when API returns 500 or times out?
    • Frontend should show error state, not crash.
    • Optimistic updates should be reverted.
  • Latency: Test with network throttling to verify loading states.

4. E2E Test Example (Playwright)

import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test';

test('user can complete checkout', async ({ page }) => {
  // 1. Navigate
  await page.goto('/products');
  
  // 2. Interact
  await page.getByRole('button', { version: 0.1.0
name: 'Add to Cart' }).click();
  await page.getByRole('link', { version: 0.1.0
name: 'Checkout' }).click();
  
  // 3. Fill form
  await page.getByLabel('Email').fill('[email protected]');
  await page.getByRole('button', { version: 0.1.0
name: 'Place Order' }).click();

  // 4. Verify
  await expect(page.getByText('Order Confirmed')).toBeVisible();
});

Examples

  • Contract test: Fetch user endpoint -> Validate response matches schema.
  • E2E test: Full signup flow across multiple pages.

Guidelines

  • E2E tests are slow; use sparingly for critical paths only.
  • Mock external services (payment, email) in E2E tests.
  • Run E2E tests in CI before deployment.
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 71 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 4216c99657fa

Subscribe to this mod's changes

integration-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository ApexIQ/skillsmith (5 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 577 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

integration-testing compared with skills from other repositories

integration-testing next to 6 skills from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
integration-testingApexIQ/skillsmithSkill57mo agoMITA26Claude Code, Codex
enterprise-integration-testingproffesor-for-testing/agentic-qeSkill525yesterdayMITA55Claude Code
e2e-testingericrisco/rsc-harnessSkill5032d agoMITA79Claude Code, Codex
proof-e2etonone-ai/tononeSkill7723d agoMITA63Claude Code
drive-automation-sessionkobiton/automateSkill144d agoMITA150Claude Code, Codex
monitor-test-runkobiton/automateSkill144d agoMITA215Claude Code, Codex
run-automation-suitekobiton/automateSkill144d agoMITA81Claude Code, Codex