Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add app-builders-club/design-builder --skill generate-librarygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/app-builders-club/design-builderWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/app-builders-club/design-builder/generate-library)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/app-builders-club/design-builder/generate-library"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/app-builders-club/design-builder/generate-library/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/app-builders-club/design-builder/generate-library"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/app-builders-club/design-builder/generate-library.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00095 | $0.04282 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00048 | $0.02141 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00856 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00428 |
Grade A, and why
figma-generate-library scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- figma-generate-library — 95% identical, 3 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 316 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Design System Builder — Figma MCP Skill
Build professional-grade design systems in Figma that match code. This skill orchestrates multi-phase workflows across 20–100+ use_figma calls, enforcing quality patterns from real-world design systems (Material 3, Polaris, Figma UI3, Simple DS).
Prerequisites: The figma-use skill MUST also be loaded for every use_figma call. It provides Plugin API syntax rules (return pattern, page reset, ID return, font loading, color range). This skill provides design system domain knowledge and workflow orchestration.
Always pass skillNames: "figma-generate-library" when calling use_figma as part of this skill. This is a logging parameter — it does not affect execution.
1. The One Rule That Matters Most
This is NEVER a one-shot task. Building a design system requires 20–100+ use_figma calls across multiple phases, with mandatory user checkpoints between them. Any attempt to create everything in one call WILL produce broken, incomplete, or unrecoverable results. Break every operation to the smallest useful unit, validate, get feedback, proceed.
2. Mandatory Workflow
Every design system build follows this phase order. Skipping or reordering phases causes structural failures that are expensive to undo.
Phase 0: DISCOVERY (always first — no use_figma writes yet)
0a. Analyze codebase → extract tokens, components, naming conventions
0b. Inspect Figma file → pages, variables, components, styles, existing conventions
0c. Search subscribed libraries → use search_design_system for reusable assets
0d. Lock v1 scope → agree on exact token set + component list before any creation
0e. Map code → Figma → resolve conflicts (code and Figma disagree = ask user)
✋ USER CHECKPOINT: present full plan, await explicit approval
Phase 1: FOUNDATIONS (tokens first — always before components)
1a. Create variable collections and modes
1b. Create primitive variables (raw values, 1 mode)
1c. Create semantic variables (aliased to primitives, mode-aware)
1d. Set scopes on ALL variables
1e. Set code syntax on ALL variables
1f. Create effect styles (shadows) and text styles (typography)
→ Exit criteria: every token from the agreed plan exists, all scopes set, all code syntax set
✋ USER CHECKPOINT: show variable summary, await approval
Phase 2: FILE STRUCTURE (before components)
2a. Create page skeleton: Cover → Getting Started → Foundations → --- → Components → --- → Utilities
2b. Create foundations documentation pages (color swatches, type specimens, spacing bars)
→ Exit criteria: all planned pages exist, foundations docs are navigable
✋ USER CHECKPOINT: show page list + screenshot, await approval
Phase 3: COMPONENTS (one at a time — never batch)
For EACH component (in dependency order: atoms before molecules):
3a. Create dedicated page
3b. Build base component with auto-layout + full variable bindings
3c. Create all variant combinations (combineAsVariants + grid layout)
3d. Add component properties (TEXT, BOOLEAN, INSTANCE_SWAP)
3e. Link properties to child nodes
3f. Add page documentation (title, description, usage notes)
3g. Validate: get_metadata (structure) + get_screenshot (visual)
3h. Optional: lightweight Code Connect mapping while context is fresh
→ Exit criteria: variant count correct, all bindings verified, screenshot looks right
✋ USER CHECKPOINT per component: show screenshot, await approval before next component
Phase 4: INTEGRATION + QA (final pass)
4a. Finalize all Code Connect mappings
4b. Accessibility audit (contrast, min touch targets, focus visibility)
4c. Naming audit (no duplicates, no unnamed nodes, consistent casing)
4d. Unresolved bindings audit (no hardcoded fills/strokes remaining)
4e. Final review screenshots of every page
✋ USER CHECKPOINT: complete sign-off
What ships with it
16 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/code-connect-setup.md 12 KB
- references/component-creation.md 38 KB
- references/discovery-phase.md 19 KB
- references/documentation-creation.md 27 KB
- references/error-recovery.md 21 KB
- references/naming-conventions.md 19 KB
- references/token-creation.md 34 KB
- scripts/bindVariablesToComponent.js 3.6 KB runs code
- scripts/cleanupOrphans.js 3.6 KB runs code
- scripts/createComponentWithVariants.js 4.8 KB runs code
- scripts/createDocumentationPage.js 5.1 KB runs code
- scripts/createSemanticTokens.js 3.8 KB runs code
- scripts/createVariableCollection.js 1.7 KB runs code
- scripts/inspectFileStructure.js 3.6 KB runs code
- scripts/rehydrateState.js 2.9 KB runs code
- scripts/validateCreation.js 2.7 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 316 lines · 95 tokens per session scan A c033109baf9e
figma-generate-library is a skill published in the GitHub repository app-builders-club/design-builder (4 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 95 tokens to every session and 4,282 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
top-design
Create award-winning, immersive web experiences at the level of Awwwards-featured agencies. Use when the user mentions "Awwwards quality", "make my site stunning", "scroll animations", "parallax storytelling", "cinematic web design", "portfolio site", or "brand experience". Also trigger when elevating a standard…
design-everyday-things
Apply foundational design principles: affordances, signifiers, constraints, feedback, and conceptual models. Use when the user mentions "why is this confusing", "affordance", "error prevention", "discoverability", "human-centered design", "mental model", "mapping", "seven stages of action", "users keep making…
sxo
Search Experience Optimization (SXO) — the bridge between SEO and UX/CRO. Audits the full journey from the SERP click to the on-page goal: SERP click-through factors (title/meta/rich results that win the click), then post-click experience signals that keep users and drive conversions — above-the-fold relevance and…
influence-psychology
Apply the seven principles of ethical persuasion (reciprocity, commitment, social proof, authority, liking, scarcity, unity) to product design, copy, and sales. Use when the user mentions "social proof", "persuasive copy", "why users dont convert", "ethical persuasion", "reciprocity", "scarcity tactics", "commitment…
refactoring-ui
Audit and fix visual hierarchy, spacing, color, and depth in web UIs. Use when the user mentions "my UI looks off" (or amateur/unprofessional), "fix the design", "Tailwind styling", "color palette", "visual hierarchy", "design system", "spacing scale", or "component styling". Also trigger when building consistent…
ux-heuristics
Evaluate and improve interface usability using heuristic analysis. Use when the user mentions "usability audit", "users are confused", "form usability", "navigation problems", "Nielsen heuristics", "cognitive walkthrough", or "is this easy to use". Also trigger when reviewing a design for usability issues, improving…