Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add appleweiping/WEIPING_WIKI --skill lark-workflow-standup-reportgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/appleweiping/WEIPING_WIKIWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/appleweiping/weiping_wiki/lark-workflow-standup-report)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/appleweiping/weiping_wiki/lark-workflow-standup-report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/appleweiping/weiping_wiki/lark-workflow-standup-report/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/appleweiping/weiping_wiki/lark-workflow-standup-report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/appleweiping/weiping_wiki/lark-workflow-standup-report.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.01368 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00684 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00274 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00137 |
Grade A, and why
lark-workflow-standup-report scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to lark-workflow-standup-report — 22 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 121 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
日程待办摘要工作流
CRITICAL — 开始前 MUST 先用 Read 工具读取 ../lark-shared/SKILL.md,其中包含认证、权限处理
适用场景
- "今天有什么安排" / "今天的日程和待办"
- "明天有什么会" / "明日日程与未完成任务"
- "帮我看看今天要做什么" / "早报摘要"
- "开工摘要" / "standup report"
- "这周还有哪些安排"
前置条件
仅支持 user 身份。执行前确保已授权:
lark-cli auth login --domain calendar,task
工作流
{date} ─┬─► calendar +agenda [--start/--end] ──► 日程列表(会议/事件)
└─► task +get-my-tasks [--due-end] ──► 未完成待办列表
│
▼
AI 汇总(时间转换 + 冲突检测 + 排序)──► 摘要
Step 1: 获取日程
# 今天(默认,无需额外参数)
lark-cli calendar +agenda
# 指定日期范围(必须使用 ISO 8601 格式,不支持 "tomorrow" 等自然语言)
lark-cli calendar +agenda --start "2026-03-26T00:00:00+08:00" --end "2026-03-26T23:59:59+08:00"
注意:
--start/--end仅支持 ISO 8601 格式(如2026-01-01或2026-01-01T15:04:05+08:00)和 Unix timestamp,不支持"tomorrow"、"next monday"等自然语言。需要 AI 根据当前日期自行计算目标日期。
输出包含:event_id、summary、start_time(含 timestamp + timezone)、end_time、free_busy_status、self_rsvp_status。
Step 2: 获取未完成待办
# 默认:返回分配给当前用户的未完成任务(最多 20 条)
lark-cli task +get-my-tasks
# 只看指定日期前到期的(推荐用于摘要场景,减少数据量)
lark-cli task +get-my-tasks --due-end "2026-03-27T23:59:59+08:00"
# 获取全部(超过 20 条时)
lark-cli task +get-my-tasks --page-all
注意:不带过滤条件时可能返回大量历史待办(实测 30+ 条、100KB+),容易超出上下文限制。摘要场景建议:
- 用
--due-end过滤出目标日期前到期的任务- 如果也需要无截止日期的任务,可不加过滤,但 AI 汇总时只展示近 30 天内创建的,其余折叠为"其他 N 项历史待办"
Step 3: AI 汇总
将 Step 1 和 Step 2 的结果整合,按以下结构输出:
## {日期}摘要({YYYY-MM-DD 星期X})
### 日程安排
| 时间 | 事件 | 组织者 | 状态 |
|------|------|--------|------|
| 09:00-10:00 | 产品需求评审 | 张三 | 已接受 |
| 14:00-15:00 | 技术方案讨论 | 李四 | 待确认 |
### 待办事项
- [ ] {task_summary}(截止:{due_date})
- [ ] {task_summary}
### 小结
- 共 {n} 场会议,{m} 项待办
- 冲突提醒:{列出时间重叠的日程}
- 空闲时段:{free_slots}(根据日程推算)
数据处理规则:
- 时间转换:API 返回 Unix timestamp,需根据
timezone字段(通常为Asia/Shanghai)转换为HH:mm格式 - RSVP 状态映射:
API 值 显示文案 accept已接受 decline已拒绝 needs_action待确认 tentative暂定 - 日程排序:按开始时间升序排列
- 冲突检测:按时间排序后,检查相邻日程是否有时间重叠(前一个 end_time > 后一个 start_time),有则在小结中列出冲突组
- 已拒绝日程:标注"已拒绝"但不计入忙碌时段和冲突检测
- 待办排序:按截止时间升序,已过期的标注"已过期",无截止时间的排在最后
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 121 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 42ce3008a6d8
lark-workflow-standup-report is a skill published in the GitHub repository appleweiping/WEIPING_WIKI (122 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 1,368 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to lark-workflow-standup-report, differing in 22 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
recipe-create-meet-space
Create a Google Meet meeting space and share the join link.
workthreads
SpecStory Workthreads - a weekly work-thread rollup across a team's repos from SpecStory coding histories (any agent - Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, and more). It groups the window's sessions into threads of work per project and labels each new / open / recently closed, so a lead sees what shipped, what is still…
atmos-config
Atmos root configuration: atmos.yaml discovery, precedence, deep merging, basepath, imports, minimal bootstrap, and routing to narrower Atmos skills.
story-readiness
Validate that a story file is implementation-ready. Checks for embedded GDD requirements, ADR references, engine notes, clear acceptance criteria, and no open design questions. Produces READY / NEEDS WORK / BLOCKED verdict with specific gaps. Use when user says 'is this story ready', 'can I start on this story', 'is…
autotask-creator
Rules for automation CRUD from the group-chat commander. The commander does not call mutation tools and does not edit cloud/autotasks files directly. It emits one or more top-level ... containers in its final text; the bus parses and applies them after the turn.
projects
List all managed projects with status, branch, open PRs, and open issue counts — portfolio-level view.