review

review is a skill for Claude Code from ApurvBazari/claude-plugins. It costs 72 tokens per session (1,621 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A read-only review workflow that checks the current coding changes against their specification and plan, then produces an interactive review document.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review recently built changes, verify findings, reconcile results, and render a review report.
Why use it?
It helps find mismatches and problems before code is committed or released, while leaving the final decision to the developer.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: mentions subagents; names the AskUserQuestion tool.

Part of the lens plugin — 4 skills, 6 agents shipped together

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/apurvbazari/claude-plugins/review
Any agent
npx skills add ApurvBazari/claude-plugins --skill review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ApurvBazari/claude-plugins

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install lens, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 4 skills, 6 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/apurvbazari/claude-plugins/review.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/apurvbazari/claude-plugins/review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/apurvbazari/claude-plugins/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/apurvbazari/claude-plugins/review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 72 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,621 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00072 $0.01621
Opus 5 $0.00036 $0.00811
Sonnet 5 $0.00014 $0.00324
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00162

Measured 5d ago against content hash 578f9d24c0a6, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-06, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

lens/skills/review/SKILL.md · 80 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 80 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Review — Intent-Grounded Review of the Current Session

You are invoked via /lens:review [target]. Run the engine, then render. You are read-only: never commit, edit, or block — produce the artifact; the human decides.

Step 0: Create the task list (standalone only)

Create the in-session progress task list per references/task-tracking.md — one TaskCreate per stage, all status:"pending": scope, intent, analyze, verify, reconcile, render, report, plus setup only when .claude/lens/settings.md is absent. Keep each returned taskId. As the pipeline runs, mark each review-owned task (setup, reconcile, render, report) in_progress when its step begins and completed when it ends; the four engine-owned tasks (scope, intent, analyze, verify) are transitioned by the engine via the taskIds you hand it in Step 2.

Step 1: First-run setup (guard)

If .claude/lens/settings.md is absent, mark the setup task in_progress, run references/setup.md: ask via AskUserQuestion (1) gitignore the .claude/lens/ dir? (offer "artifacts only — track the registry" so teams can share finders) and (2) the default output path; persist to settings.md, then mark setup completed. On later runs, just read settings (no setup task exists — see Step 0).

Step 2: Run the engine

Invoke lens:engine (Skill tool), passing the target + the project finders registered in settings + taskIds = { scope, intent, analyze, verify } so the engine transitions those four stages as it runs. It returns a review-findings object in context. The full engine input/return contract is declared in ../engine/references/engine-api.md. Empty scope (empty diff / no repo): key the empty-scope branch on result.emptyScope === true — the engine's discriminator — not on an empty findings[]. When result.emptyScope is true, mark the review-owned reconcile and render tasks deleted, mark report completed with a one-line "nothing to review", and skip Steps 3–5 — there is nothing to reconcile, render, or write. (The engine already marked scope completed and intent/analyze/verify deleted, so every stage is accounted for once, with no double-transition and no stranded stage.) Clean review (real diff, zero findings): when result.emptyScope is falsy but findings[] is empty, a review did run and simply found nothing — fall through to Steps 3–5 and render a normal ship / no-findings artifact (verdict ship, adherence still shown). Do not take the empty-scope branch.

Read the full file on GitHub · 80 lines

Files

What ships with it

5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 80 lines · 72 tokens per session scan A 578f9d24c0a6

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review is a skill published in the GitHub repository ApurvBazari/claude-plugins (0 stars, last pushed 29d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 72 tokens to every session and 1,621 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.