Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Aquifer-sea/pattern8 --skill code_reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Aquifer-sea/pattern8Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aquifer-sea/pattern8/code_review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aquifer-sea/pattern8/code_review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aquifer-sea/pattern8/code_review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aquifer-sea/pattern8/code_review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aquifer-sea/pattern8/code_review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.00364 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00146 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00073 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00036 |
Grade B, and why
code_review scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Recursive force deletemediumDestructive command
rm -rf with a variable or a broad path is one typo away from removing the wrong tree.
Commands matching the blacklist (e.g., rm -rf, sudo) must be rejected immediately. Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
What it actually says
Code Review
Constrains the Agent to perform structured code reviews covering four dimensions: correctness, security, performance, and maintainability.
Step 1: Inversion (Requirements Alignment)
Before starting a review, you must check every item in assets/checklist.yaml.
Step 2: Generator (Generate Review Report from Template)
Your output must strictly follow the format defined in assets/template.yaml.
You must cover all four dimensions: correctness, security, performance, maintainability.
No section may be skipped.
Step 3: Tool Wrapper (Security Fence)
If you need to execute code to verify issues, you must first check references/security.yaml.
Commands matching the blacklist (e.g., rm -rf, sudo) must be rejected immediately.
Step 4: Reviewer (Self-Audit Loop)
After generating the review report, audit it against the criteria in references/guidelines.yaml.
If any criterion is not met (e.g., missing line numbers, no fix code), roll back and regenerate.
Up to 3 retries. If still non-compliant after 3 retries, inform the user which criteria failed.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 46 lines · 23 tokens per session scan B d0c8f6003901
code_review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Aquifer-sea/pattern8 (44 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 364 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (recursive force delete). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-stack
Stack review of one or more third-party tools (OXC, TanStack, Vite, cf, Sentry, pnpm, Claude Code...) against current official best practices, or of what a dependency bump brings (bumped): one parallel subagent per tool, verified findings, one consolidated plan in chat. USE WHEN: user runs /review-stack or explicitly…
review
Code and design review of this repo by domain - architecture, ci, code-quality, configuration, performance, security, seo, simplicity, tests, ui: one parallel reviewer subagent per selected domain, verified findings, one consolidated plan in chat with IDs to answer. USE WHEN: user runs /review, optionally with domains…
resolve-fixed-pr-comments
Verify what PR review comments have been addressed (committed/pushed OR uncommitted local changes) and resolve the threads that are genuinely fixed or no longer relevant.
review-local-changes
Review your local uncommitted working-tree changes (git diff plus untracked files) and return actionable improvement suggestions. Use before committing, when nothing has been pushed yet.
attach-review-to-pr
Add line-specific review comments to pull requests using GitHub CLI API.
critique
Comprehensive multi-perspective review using specialized judges with debate and consensus building.