code-smell-detector

code-smell-detector is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from ArabelaTso/Skills-4-SE. It costs 129 tokens per session (3,641 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A Python code review that looks for recurring design and maintainability problems, called code smells, such as duplicated code, oversized classes, magic numbers, and long parameter lists.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to scan Python files automatically or review them manually, with options to focus on particular folders, smell types, or whether tests should be included.
Why use it?
It helps find code that may be difficult to understand, test, change, or reuse before those problems spread through the project.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: positional $N argument.

Good fit Use it to scan Python files automatically or review them manually, with options to focus on particular folders, smell types, or whether tests should be included.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/arabelatso/skills-4-se/code-smell-detector
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add ArabelaTso/Skills-4-SE --skill code-smell-detector
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ArabelaTso/Skills-4-SE

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for code-smell-detector

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arabelatso/skills-4-se/code-smell-detector/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/arabelatso/skills-4-se/code-smell-detector)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arabelatso/skills-4-se/code-smell-detector"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arabelatso/skills-4-se/code-smell-detector/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for code-smell-detector

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arabelatso/skills-4-se/code-smell-detector"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arabelatso/skills-4-se/code-smell-detector.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 129 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,641 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00129 $0.03641
Opus 5.5 $0.00052 $0.01456
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00026 $0.00728
Haiku 4.5 $0.00013 $0.00364

Measured 1mo ago against content hash c3528e8b0969, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-smell-detector scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 1 executable file (scripts/detect_smells.py), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/code-smell-detector/SKILL.md · 609 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 609 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Code Smell Detector

Overview

Identify code quality and design smells in Python codebases, then provide specific refactoring recommendations to improve maintainability and design.

Workflow

1. Understand the Analysis Scope

Define what to analyze:

Questions to ask:

  • What directory or files should be analyzed?
  • Focus on quality smells, design smells, or both?
  • Are there specific concerns (e.g., "this class is too complex")?
  • Should test files be included?

Determine scope:

# Check project structure
ls -la

# Count Python files
find . -name "*.py" | wc -l

# Identify large files (potential smells)
find . -name "*.py" -exec wc -l {} + | sort -rn | head -10

2. Detect Code Smells

Use multiple detection strategies.

Strategy 1: Automated Detection

Use the bundled script for AST-based analysis:

# Scan entire project
python scripts/detect_smells.py /path/to/project

# Exclude specific directories
python scripts/detect_smells.py /path/to/project venv,tests,docs

What it detects:

  • Long methods (>50 lines)
  • Too many parameters (>5)
  • Large classes (>15 methods)
  • God classes (>20 methods)
  • Magic numbers
Strategy 2: Manual Code Review

Read the code to identify design smells. See smell-patterns.md for comprehensive catalog.

Look for:

Code Quality Smells:

  • Duplicate code blocks
  • Magic numbers (unexplained numeric literals)
  • Hardcoded values (paths, URLs, config)
  • Commented-out code
  • Inconsistent naming

Design Smells:

  • God classes (too many responsibilities)
  • Feature envy (method uses more from another class)
  • Inappropriate intimacy (classes too coupled)
  • Data clumps (same parameters repeated)
  • Primitive obsession (using primitives instead of objects)
  • Long parameter lists (>5 parameters)

Search patterns:

# Find long files (potential large classes)
find . -name "*.py" -exec wc -l {} + | awk '$1 > 300'

# Find magic numbers (basic pattern)
grep -r "[^0-9]\d\{3,\}" --include="*.py" .

# Find hardcoded paths
grep -r '"/.*/"' --include="*.py" .

# Find commented code
grep -r "^[ ]*#.*def \|^[ ]*#.*class " --include="*.py" .

Read the full file on GitHub · 609 lines

Files

What ships with it

3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 609 lines · 129 tokens per session scan A c3528e8b0969

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-smell-detector is a skill published in the GitHub repository ArabelaTso/Skills-4-SE (259 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 129 tokens to every session and 3,641 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.