Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ArabelaTso/Skills-4-SE --skill static-reasoning-verifiergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ArabelaTso/Skills-4-SEWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/arabelatso/skills-4-se/static-reasoning-verifier)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arabelatso/skills-4-se/static-reasoning-verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arabelatso/skills-4-se/static-reasoning-verifier/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arabelatso/skills-4-se/static-reasoning-verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arabelatso/skills-4-se/static-reasoning-verifier.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00124 | $0.02923 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00062 | $0.01461 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00585 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00292 |
Grade A, and why
static-reasoning-verifier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 548 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Static Reasoning Verifier
Verify code correctness statically against specifications through type checking, contract verification, and formal reasoning.
Quick Start
Verify Python Code
# Type checking and contract verification
python scripts/verify_python.py src/app.py
# Strict mode (enforce all type annotations)
python scripts/verify_python.py src/ --strict
Verify Java Code
# Type checking, null safety, and JML contracts
python scripts/verify_java.py src/Main.java
# Strict mode (enforce JML contracts)
python scripts/verify_java.py src/ --strict
Verification Types
1. Type Checking
Verify type correctness using static type checkers:
Python (mypy):
def add(a: int, b: int) -> int:
return a + b
result: int = add(5, 10) # ✅ Type safe
result: str = add(5, 10) # ❌ Type error
Java:
public int add(int a, int b) {
return a + b;
}
int result = add(5, 10); // ✅ Type safe
String result = add(5, 10); // ❌ Compile error
2. Contract Verification
Verify preconditions, postconditions, and invariants:
Python:
def sqrt(x: float) -> float:
"""
Calculate square root.
Requires:
- x >= 0
Ensures:
- result * result ≈ x
"""
assert x >= 0, "Input must be non-negative"
result = x ** 0.5
assert abs(result * result - x) < 1e-10
return result
Java (JML):
/*@ requires x >= 0;
@ ensures \result >= 0;
@ ensures \result * \result <= x;
@*/
public static int sqrt(int x) {
// Implementation
}
3. Null Safety
Verify null pointer safety:
Java:
public @NonNull String getName(@NonNull User user) {
return user.getName(); // Safe - user cannot be null
}
Python:
from typing import Optional
def find_user(user_id: int) -> Optional[User]:
"""May return None if user not found."""
return database.get_user(user_id)
Verification Workflow
1. Write Specifications
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 548 lines · 124 tokens per session scan A e18f1be4db8d
static-reasoning-verifier is a skill published in the GitHub repository ArabelaTso/Skills-4-SE (251 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 124 tokens to every session and 2,923 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
verify
Verify Elixir/Phoenix changes — compile, format, and test in one loop. Use after implementation, before PRs, or after fixing bugs.
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
test-first-bugs
Enforces a test-driven bug-fixing workflow. Use when a user reports a bug, failing code, an error, or asks to fix something.
java-code-review
Review Java code for bugs, duplicate code, correctness risks, maintainability improvements, and missing tests. By default review files modified in git; when the user explicitly names files, classes, packages, or a diff, review that scope instead. Generate a detailed review.md report with actionable comments and fixes.
run-checks
Run the project's full verification gate: every check the project defines as a pass/fail condition, built from its CI config, check scripts, and configured tools, or from a formatter-linter-test baseline when it declares none. Use when the user asks to "run checks", "run the verification gate", "run lint and tests"…
flake-triage
Decide whether a preview the visual-diff bot flagged actually regressed or is simply nondeterministic, using a repeat-render oracle at a single commit. Use when a PR's preview diff reports a changed preview whose source the PR does not touch, or when a render, GIF or filmstrip is suspected of being unstable.