jvm-testing

jvm-testing is a skill for Claude Code from AratKruglik/claude-sdlc. It costs 162 tokens per session (1,875 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A collection of testing patterns for Java and other JVM projects. It covers JUnit 5, Mockito, AssertJ, and Testcontainers, which support tests, test doubles, readable checks, and tests against real services in containers.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for writing unit and integration tests, including parameterized cases, mocked dependencies, fluent assertions, and tests using containerized services.
Why use it?
It helps developers structure tests consistently and avoid unclear tests, excessive mocking, or weak checks.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the java-foundation plugin — 3 skills shipped together

Good fit It is for writing unit and integration tests, including parameterized cases, mocked dependencies, fluent assertions, and tests using containerized services.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/aratkruglik/claude-sdlc/jvm-testing
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add AratKruglik/claude-sdlc --skill jvm-testing
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AratKruglik/claude-sdlc

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install java-foundation, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 3 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for jvm-testing

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aratkruglik/claude-sdlc/jvm-testing/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aratkruglik/claude-sdlc/jvm-testing)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aratkruglik/claude-sdlc/jvm-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aratkruglik/claude-sdlc/jvm-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for jvm-testing

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aratkruglik/claude-sdlc/jvm-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aratkruglik/claude-sdlc/jvm-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 162 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,875 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00162 $0.01875
Opus 5 $0.00081 $0.00937
Sonnet 5 $0.00032 $0.00375
Haiku 4.5 $0.00016 $0.00187

Measured 11d ago against content hash 1238bce30100, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

jvm-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/java-foundation/skills/jvm-testing/SKILL.md · 258 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 258 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

JVM Testing Patterns (stack-agnostic)

JUnit 5 fundamentals

import org.junit.jupiter.api.*;
import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.*;

class UserServiceTest {

    private UserRepository repository;
    private UserService service;

    @BeforeEach
    void setUp() {
        repository = mock(UserRepository.class);
        service = new UserService(repository);
    }

    @Test
    void registerUser_withValidData_returnsActiveUser() {
        // Arrange
        var command = new RegisterUserCommand("[email protected]", "Secret1!");
        when(repository.existsByEmail("[email protected]")).thenReturn(false);
        when(repository.save(any())).thenAnswer(inv -> inv.getArgument(0));

        // Act
        var user = service.register(command);

        // Assert
        assertThat(user.email()).isEqualTo("[email protected]");
        assertThat(user.isActive()).isTrue();
    }

    @Test
    void registerUser_withDuplicateEmail_throwsException() {
        when(repository.existsByEmail(any())).thenReturn(true);

        assertThatThrownBy(() -> service.register(new RegisterUserCommand("[email protected]", "pass")))
            .isInstanceOf(DuplicateEmailException.class)
            .hasMessageContaining("[email protected]");
    }
}

Test method naming: methodName_condition_expectedOutcome (readable without comments). @DisplayName for BDD-style prose when the method name would be unwieldy.

AAA structure: Arrange → Act → Assert. Separate with blank lines (no comments needed when the structure is clear).

One assertion concept per test. Multiple assertThat calls are fine when they all verify the same behaviour.

Parameterised tests

@ParameterizedTest
@ValueSource(strings = { "", " ", "\t", "\n" })
void isBlank_variousBlankStrings_returnsTrue(String input) {
    assertThat(StringUtils.isBlank(input)).isTrue();
}

@ParameterizedTest
@CsvSource({
    "[email protected], true",
    "not-an-email,      false",
    "@nodomain.com,     false",
})
void isValidEmail(String email, boolean expected) {
    assertThat(validator.isValid(email)).isEqualTo(expected);
}

@ParameterizedTest
@MethodSource("invalidCommands")
void register_withInvalidCommand_throws(RegisterUserCommand command) {
    assertThatThrownBy(() -> service.register(command))
        .isInstanceOf(ValidationException.class);
}

static Stream<RegisterUserCommand> invalidCommands() {
    return Stream.of(
        new RegisterUserCommand(null, "pass"),
        new RegisterUserCommand("", "pass"),
        new RegisterUserCommand("[email protected]", "")
    );
}

Read the full file on GitHub · 258 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 258 lines · 162 tokens per session scan A 1238bce30100

Subscribe to this mod's changes

jvm-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository AratKruglik/claude-sdlc (33 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 162 tokens to every session and 1,875 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

temporal-python-testing

Test Temporal workflows with pytest, time-skipping, and mocking strategies. Covers unit testing, integration testing, replay testing, and local development setup. Use when implementing Temporal workflow tests or debugging test failures.

wshobson/agents · 45 tokens

setup

Wire Ginkgo into a Go package — install the ginkgo CLI and Ginkgo+Gomega, ginkgo bootstrap to generate the suitetest.go (TestXxx/RegisterFailHandler(Fail)/RunSpecs), the package xxxtest convention, dot-import alternatives (aliased import, dsl/ subpackages, --nodot), ginkgo generate, and testing.T interop via…

onsi/ginkgo · 118 tokens

migrate-xunit-to-xunit-v3

Migrate .NET test projects from xUnit.net v2 to xunit.v3 and fix v3 breaks. Use for package/CPM conversion, OutputType=Exe, preserving the VSTest or MTP runner (including projects currently using YTest.MTP.XUnit2), incompatible TFMs, async void tests, string-to-Type attributes, custom Fact/Theory/BeforeAfterTest…

dotnet/skills · 149 tokens

golang-testing

Production-ready Golang tests — table-driven tests, testify suites and mocks, parallel tests, fuzzing, fixtures, goroutine leak detection with goleak, snapshot testing, code coverage, integration tests, idiomatic test naming. Use when writing or reviewing Go tests, choosing a testing approach, setting up Go test CI…

samber/cc-skills-golang · 115 tokens

assertions

Write correct synchronous Gomega assertions — Expect/Ω notation, the To/NotTo/ToNot/Should/ShouldNot equivalences, the multi-return error idiom, Succeed vs HaveOccurred, the .Error() chaining form, annotating assertions (format-string and func()string), tuning failure output via the format subpackage…

onsi/gomega · 145 tokens

adk-setup

Sets up a local ADK Python development environment in a git clone of the open-source adk-python repository: a uv virtual environment, all dependency extras, pre-commit hooks, and a first unit-test run. Runs only when explicitly requested, never on its own. Use when asked to set up, bootstrap, or repair a development…

google/adk-python · 146 tokens