Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AratKruglik/claude-sdlcnpx agentmods add skills/aratkruglik/claude-sdlc/vue-testingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aratkruglik/claude-sdlc/vue-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aratkruglik/claude-sdlc/vue-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aratkruglik/claude-sdlc/vue-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aratkruglik/claude-sdlc/vue-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aratkruglik/claude-sdlc/vue-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00155 | $0.03503 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00062 | $0.01401 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00031 | $0.00701 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00350 |
Grade A, and why
vue-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 472 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Vue 3 Testing Patterns
Test framework selection
| Layer | Framework |
|---|---|
| Component, composable, plain TS unit | Vitest + @vue/test-utils (preferred for Vite projects) |
| Component (alt) | @testing-library/vue (RTL-style API) |
| Component in browser | Cypress component testing (slower, more realistic) |
| End-to-end | Playwright (preferred) or Cypress |
For Vue 3 + Vite, Vitest is the modern default. Match what's installed.
Vitest setup
vite.config.ts:
import { defineConfig } from 'vitest/config';
import vue from '@vitejs/plugin-vue';
import path from 'path';
export default defineConfig({
plugins: [vue()],
test: {
environment: 'jsdom',
globals: true,
setupFiles: ['./vitest.setup.ts'],
coverage: {
reporter: ['text', 'html'],
exclude: ['**/*.config.*', '**/*.spec.*', 'src/main.ts'],
},
},
resolve: {
alias: { '@': path.resolve(__dirname, './src') },
},
});
vitest.setup.ts:
// Add custom matchers if needed
import { afterEach } from 'vitest';
import { config } from '@vue/test-utils';
afterEach(() => {
// cleanup mounted components
});
// Stub global components if needed
config.global.stubs = {
RouterLink: true,
RouterView: true,
};
Install: pnpm add -D vitest @vue/test-utils @vitejs/plugin-vue jsdom.
mount vs shallowMount
import { mount, shallowMount } from '@vue/test-utils';
// mount renders ALL children real
const wrapper = mount(MyComponent, { props: { name: 'Alice' } });
// shallowMount stubs ALL child components (renders <ChildComponent-stub />)
const wrapper = shallowMount(MyComponent, { props: { name: 'Alice' } });
Prefer mount — catches integration bugs (prop passing, slot rendering). Use shallowMount only for very large component trees where rendering full subtrees is slow.
Component test (basics)
// src/components/UserCard.spec.ts
import { describe, it, expect, vi } from 'vitest';
import { mount } from '@vue/test-utils';
import UserCard from './UserCard.vue';
describe('UserCard', () => {
it('renders user name and email', () => {
const wrapper = mount(UserCard, {
props: { user: { id: '1', name: 'Alice', email: '[email protected]' } },
});
expect(wrapper.text()).toContain('Alice');
expect(wrapper.text()).toContain('[email protected]');
});
it('emits "delete" when delete button clicked', async () => {
const wrapper = mount(UserCard, {
props: { user: { id: '1', name: 'Alice', email: '[email protected]' } },
});
await wrapper.find('[data-testid="delete-btn"]').trigger('click');
expect(wrapper.emitted('delete')).toEqual([['1']]);
});
it('renders header slot when provided', () => {
const wrapper = mount(UserCard, {
props: { user: { id: '1', name: 'Alice', email: '[email protected]' } },
slots: { header: '<h2>Custom Header</h2>' },
});
expect(wrapper.find('h2').text()).toBe('Custom Header');
});
});
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines 5ab01213ab1b
- 1mo ago First seen · 470 lines · 155 tokens per session scan A a0478bddcf57
vue-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository AratKruglik/claude-sdlc (53 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 155 tokens to every session and 3,503 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
test-master
Generates test files, creates mocking strategies, analyzes code coverage, designs test architectures, and produces test plans and defect reports across functional, performance, and security testing disciplines. Use when writing unit tests, integration tests, or E2E tests; creating test strategies or automation…
axiom-testing
Use when writing ANY test, debugging flaky tests, making tests faster, or choosing Swift Testing vs XCTest. Covers unit tests, UI tests, async testing, test architecture.
designing-tests
Designs and implements testing strategies for any codebase. Use when adding tests, improving coverage, setting up testing infrastructure, debugging test failures, or when asked about unit tests, integration tests, or E2E testing.
testing-blocks
Use this when you have made AEM Edge Delivery Services code changes to blocks, scripts, or styles and need to validate them before opening a pull request. Covers unit testing for utilities and logic, browser testing with Playwright, linting, and guidance on what to test and how.
test-automation-expert
Comprehensive test automation specialist covering unit, integration, and E2E testing strategies. Expert in Jest, Vitest, Playwright, Cypress, pytest, and modern testing frameworks. Guides test pyramid design, coverage optimization, flaky test detection, and CI/CD integration. Activate on 'test strategy', 'unit tests'…
JMeter Load Testing
Load and performance testing skill using Apache JMeter, covering test plans, thread groups, assertions, listeners, timers, and distributed testing.