Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/arbazkhan971/godmode/graphqlnpx skills add arbazkhan971/godmode --skill graphqlgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/arbazkhan971/godmodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/arbazkhan971/godmode/graphql)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arbazkhan971/godmode/graphql"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arbazkhan971/godmode/graphql.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00056 | $0.01915 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00958 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00383 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00192 |
Grade A, and why
graphql scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 273 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
GraphQL — API Development
Activate When
- User invokes
/godmode:graphql - User says "build a GraphQL API", "design schema"
- User says "write a graphql resolver", "resolver", "graphql resolver"
- User says "fix N+1 queries", "add DataLoader"
- User says "set up subscriptions", "federate schema"
Workflow
Step 1: Discovery & Context
# Detect GraphQL framework
grep -l "apollo-server\|graphql-yoga\|mercurius\|\
pothos\|nexus\|type-graphql\|strawberry\|gqlgen" \
package.json pyproject.toml go.mod 2>/dev/null
# Check for DataLoader usage
grep -rl "dataloader\|DataLoader" src/ 2>/dev/null
# Find schema files
find . -name "*.graphql" -o -name "*.gql" \
| head -10
GRAPHQL DISCOVERY:
Approach: SDL-first | Code-first
Framework: Apollo | Yoga | Mercurius | Pothos | gqlgen
Consumers: web app | mobile | third-party
Auth: JWT | session | API key
Federation: monolith | gateway + subgraphs
IF no DataLoader and has relations: N+1 is likely
IF no depth limit: production API is vulnerable
IF no complexity limit: one query can DoS the server
Step 2: Schema Design
# SDL-first example
type Query {
user(id: ID!): User
users(first: Int!, after: String): UserConnection!
}
type Mutation {
createUser(input: CreateUserInput!): CreateUserPayload!
}
# Every mutation returns payload with errors array
type CreateUserPayload {
user: User
errors: [UserError!]!
}
SCHEMA RULES:
Mutations return payload types (never throw)
All lists use Relay connections (edges, pageInfo)
Input types separate from output types
Non-nullable uses ! intentionally
Enums for fixed sets, never strings
THRESHOLDS:
Max query depth: 10 levels
Max query complexity: 1000 points
Connection max first/last: 100 items
IF depth > 10: reject query
IF complexity > 1000: reject query
Step 3: Resolver Architecture
Resolvers are thin orchestration — no business logic. Business logic lives in service layer.
Step 4: N+1 Detection and DataLoader
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 273 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A 6a955bd79c4b
graphql is a skill published in the GitHub repository arbazkhan971/godmode (26 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 1,915 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
jobs-to-be-done
Discover what customers truly need by analyzing the "job" they hire your product to do. Use when the user mentions "customer discovery", "why customers churn", "what job does this solve", "competing against luck", "product-market fit", "switching behavior", "milkshake moment", or "functional vs emotional jobs". Also…
asc-subscription-localization
Bulk-localize subscription, subscription-group, and in-app purchase display names across App Store locales using asc, including API 4.4.1 version-scoped v2 resources. Use when filling or updating subscription/IAP names and descriptions without App Store Connect UI work.
agent-code-generator
Generates Agent definitions (.md files) based on user intent and standard templates.
codex
Run benchmark-selected GPT-5.6 work through the Codex CLI.
scienceworld-growth-focuser
Use when you have planted a seed or need to track a plant's growth stage (sprouting, flowering, reproduction). Applies the 'focus on' action to a specific plant or biological entity to signal intent and monitor its development. Trigger after planting or when you need to observe life cycle progression in the…
iterate-pivot-decision
Documents a strategic pivot or persevere decision with the evidence, analysis, and rationale. Use when evaluating whether to change direction on a product, feature, or strategy based on market feedback.