Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add arbiterForge/codeArbiter --skill ca-cleanupgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/arbiterForge/codeArbiterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/arbiterforge/codearbiter/ca-cleanup)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arbiterforge/codearbiter/ca-cleanup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arbiterforge/codearbiter/ca-cleanup/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arbiterforge/codearbiter/ca-cleanup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arbiterforge/codearbiter/ca-cleanup.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.03253 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.01301 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00651 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00325 |
Grade A, and why
ca-cleanup scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 22d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 22d ago Changed · +189 lines · -20 tokens per session 4f05103428e2
- 1mo ago First seen · 62 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A f2667fe68360
ca-cleanup is a skill published in the GitHub repository arbiterForge/codeArbiter (149 stars, last pushed today), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 3,253 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
enterprise-pr-review
End-to-end PR conversation closer and advisory review harvester for enterprise work. Use this whenever the user mentions unresolved PR conversations, Copilot/GitHub review comments, a PR that cannot merge, skipped/non-blocking Copilot feedback, a failed PR review, or asks to address/resolve/learn from PR feedback. It…
issues-to-green-pr
Automation-safe GitHub issue to green PR orchestrator. Use when Codex is asked to process GitHub issues labeled bug or needs-triage, run a one-agent-one-job repair workflow, create or babysit PRs, get PR checks/review threads green, or run a recurring Codex automation that turns eligible issues into proved pull…
post-merge-test-kit
Create or run a post-merge validation kit for a PR after it lands. Use when the user asks how to test a merged PR, validate a release, smoke-test production, verify deploy behavior, or choose agent-run versus human-run post-merge checks.
enterprise-harness
Use when enterprise work has been built and reviewed and needs a final mechanical ship or release gate before merge, PR readiness, install, deploy, or signoff. Checks proof trace, current diff, architecture, post-merge test kit, rollback, observability, security/privacy, and performance regression readiness.
incremental-implementation
Delivers changes incrementally. Use when implementing any feature or change that touches more than one file. Use when you're about to write a large amount of code at once, or when a task feels too big to land in one step.
issue-to-green-pr
Standalone single GitHub issue to green PR orchestrator. Use when Codex is asked to target one specific GitHub issue number, owner/repo#number, or issue URL and drive it through a one-subagent-one-job repair workflow into a proved PR. Requires diagnose, blast-radius, patch-or-fix, live GitHub gate discovery…