Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add arbiterForge/codeArbiter --skill ca-conflictgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/arbiterForge/codeArbiterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/arbiterforge/codearbiter/ca-conflict)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arbiterforge/codearbiter/ca-conflict"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arbiterforge/codearbiter/ca-conflict/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arbiterforge/codearbiter/ca-conflict"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arbiterforge/codearbiter/ca-conflict.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.00521 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00208 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00104 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00052 |
Grade A, and why
ca-conflict scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 62 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A f7944fc6fdac
ca-conflict is a skill published in the GitHub repository arbiterForge/codeArbiter (149 stars, last pushed today), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 521 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
gdpr-audit
GDPR compliance audit of code, plans, schemas, or IaC. Produces a findings report with article citations, severity, confidence, and fixes; flags evidence gaps. Not a substitute for a DPO/lawyer.
owasp-ai-testing
AI trustworthiness testing using OWASP AI Testing Guide v1. Execute 32 test cases across 4 layers (Application, Model, Infrastructure, Data) with practical payloads and remediation.
nist-ai-rmf
AI risk assessment using NIST AI RMF 1.0 framework. Evaluate AI systems across 4 core functions (Govern, Map, Measure, Manage) for trustworthy and responsible AI deployment.
iso-42001-ai-governance
AI governance readiness and gap assessment using ISO/IEC 42001:2023. Evaluate AI management-system practices for risk management, accountability, transparency, security, and continuous improvement.
don-norman-principles-audit
Evaluate UX/UI using Don Norman's 7 fundamental design principles from The Design of Everyday Things. Audit discoverability, affordances, signifiers, feedback, mapping, constraints and conceptual models.
wcag-accessibility-audit
Comprehensive web accessibility audit using WCAG 2.1/2.2 guidelines. Evaluate compliance across 4 POUR principles (Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust) with A, AA, AAA conformance levels.