Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add arbiterForge/codeArbiter --skill ca-decomposegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/arbiterForge/codeArbiterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/arbiterforge/codearbiter/ca-decompose)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arbiterforge/codearbiter/ca-decompose"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arbiterforge/codearbiter/ca-decompose/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arbiterforge/codearbiter/ca-decompose"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arbiterforge/codearbiter/ca-decompose.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.01951 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00780 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00390 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00195 |
Grade A, and why
ca-decompose scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed · -28 lines · -4 tokens per session 1e6e1d9b9b81
- 14d ago Changed · +13 lines 0e2f988a42d8
- 22d ago Changed · +139 lines a07de9aaae3e
- 1mo ago First seen · 37 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A b303e6882c74
ca-decompose is a skill published in the GitHub repository arbiterForge/codeArbiter (149 stars, last pushed today), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 1,951 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
orchestrate
Pipeline orchestration: dispatch the highest-priority ready tasks/work units to agents, manage capacity, and coordinate the Todo to Done flow. Invoked as /agiflow:orchestrate. Uses listtasks, listactivetasksbyorg, listmembers, updatetask, getworkunitprogress.
plan-360-audit
Use when a plan, design, migration, or deployment checklist is drafted and needs review before passing a planning gate or proceeding to implementation. Triggers on phrases like "review this plan", "is this ready", "gate check", "audit the plan", "stakeholder review", or whenever a document in docs/plans/…
enterprise-dev
Full enterprise workflow for legacy enterprise-dev invocations. Use when starting a feature, significant refactor, enterprise hardening effort, GitHub issue intake/processing, or multi-stage bugfix that needs end-to-end workflow control, portable repo-local artifacts, and explicit proof scope.
enterprise
Use when starting a feature, significant refactor, enterprise hardening effort, GitHub issue intake/processing, or multi-stage bugfix that needs end-to-end workflow control, portable repo-local artifacts, and explicit proof scope.
fleet-commander
Multi-orchestrator fleet management. Takes a batch of tasks, analyzes dependencies and boundaries, assigns optimal models (Opus/Sonnet/Haiku/Worker), sets up isolated worktrees, and dispatches concurrent orchestrators with merge coordination. Use when the user has multiple tasks to parallelize across agents.
planning-and-task-breakdown
Breaks work into ordered tasks. Use when you have a spec or clear requirements and need to break work into implementable tasks. Use when a task feels too large to start, when you need to estimate scope, or when parallel work is possible. For refactor, debugging, lifecycle/status, or system-design plans, require source…