Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add arbiterForge/codeArbiter --skill writing-plansgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/arbiterForge/codeArbiterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/arbiterforge/codearbiter/writing-plans)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arbiterforge/codearbiter/writing-plans"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arbiterforge/codearbiter/writing-plans/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arbiterforge/codearbiter/writing-plans"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arbiterforge/codearbiter/writing-plans.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.01395 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00558 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00279 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00139 |
Grade A, and why
writing-plans scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · +8 lines 5a4f5d9f8d7a
- 2d ago Changed · -70 lines · -31 tokens per session 314f6dfd736d
- 22d ago Changed · +11 lines f4a610d58318
- 24d ago Changed · +12 lines · -26 tokens per session b939c8f7286a
- 1mo ago Changed · +17 lines · -4 tokens per session e12dd8f3fb54
- 1mo ago Changed · +12 lines 8e0a702a325f
- 1mo ago First seen · 130 lines · 110 tokens per session scan A 379cb9ad7631
writing-plans is a skill published in the GitHub repository arbiterForge/codeArbiter (149 stars, last pushed today), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 1,395 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
gdpr-audit
GDPR compliance audit of code, plans, schemas, or IaC. Produces a findings report with article citations, severity, confidence, and fixes; flags evidence gaps. Not a substitute for a DPO/lawyer.
owasp-ai-testing
AI trustworthiness testing using OWASP AI Testing Guide v1. Execute 32 test cases across 4 layers (Application, Model, Infrastructure, Data) with practical payloads and remediation.
nist-ai-rmf
AI risk assessment using NIST AI RMF 1.0 framework. Evaluate AI systems across 4 core functions (Govern, Map, Measure, Manage) for trustworthy and responsible AI deployment.
iso-42001-ai-governance
AI governance readiness and gap assessment using ISO/IEC 42001:2023. Evaluate AI management-system practices for risk management, accountability, transparency, security, and continuous improvement.
don-norman-principles-audit
Evaluate UX/UI using Don Norman's 7 fundamental design principles from The Design of Everyday Things. Audit discoverability, affordances, signifiers, feedback, mapping, constraints and conceptual models.
wcag-accessibility-audit
Comprehensive web accessibility audit using WCAG 2.1/2.2 guidelines. Evaluate compliance across 4 POUR principles (Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust) with A, AA, AAA conformance levels.