ArcadeDB is a database management system that stores and works with several kinds of data, including graph, document, key-value, time-series, geospatial, and vector data. It is used by applications that need one database supporting interfaces such as SQL, Cypher, Gremlin, HTTP/JSON, MongoDB, and Redis. The catalogue add-on operates ArcadeDB.
Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to ArcadeData/arcadedb. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ArcadeData/arcadedb/main/.claude/skills/pr-review-surfaces/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ArcadeData/arcadedbWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/arcadedata/arcadedb/pr-review-surfaces)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arcadedata/arcadedb/pr-review-surfaces"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arcadedata/arcadedb/pr-review-surfaces/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arcadedata/arcadedb/pr-review-surfaces"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arcadedata/arcadedb/pr-review-surfaces.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00059 | $0.00360 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00144 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00072 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00036 |
Grade A, and why
pr-review-surfaces scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 29d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
PR review surfaces
The automated reviewers on a PR write to three different places, and a poll that reads only one of them misses findings for hours (PR #7437):
gh pr view <N> --json commentsshows the ISSUE comments only: theclaude-reviewjob, Codacy, Codecov.- CodeRabbit posts PR REVIEWS:
gh api repos/ArcadeData/arcadedb/pulls/<N>/reviewscarries their bodies (the nitpicks and the "outside diff range" findings) andgh api repos/ArcadeData/arcadedb/pulls/<N>/commentsthe inline threads, one per actionable finding. Reply to a thread withPOST pulls/<N>/comments/<id>/replies: CodeRabbit re-verifies the next push, answers in the thread and resolves it itself, and it re-reviews every push. - The
claude-reviewjob often finishes withpermission_denials_count > 0in its result block and posts nothing.gh run rerun <runId>gets a real review on the same commit without writing a comment; never use the@claudetrigger phrase in a comment. - A PR is ready when the latest substantive review says nothing blocks the merge, no major issue is open, every CodeRabbit thread is resolved and the checks are green.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 29d ago First seen · 21 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A e09c4488515e
pr-review-surfaces is a skill published in the GitHub repository ArcadeData/arcadedb (1,225 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 360 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
arangodb
ArangoDB multi-model database reference covering document, graph, and key-value operations. Includes AQL query language, graph traversals, shortest path algorithms, indexing, ArangoSearch, clustering, backup, and administration.
triage-contributor-pr
Triage open pull requests from external contributors to prisma/orm and produce a per-PR verdict with evidence. Use when a maintainer asks to triage, evaluate, assess, or review the queue of incoming contributor PRs, to decide whether a fork PR is safe to run CI on, to check whether a PR is in scope for its version…
review-implement-phase
Implements triaged review actions, commits focused fixes, and posts Done plus resolves threads. Use when the user wants only the implementation phase of the review-framework workflow.
review-triage-phase
Produces canonical review actions from fetched review state and renders action markdown. Use when the user wants only triage/action-planning for the review-framework workflow.
memgraph-storage-reviewer
Review code changes in Memgraph's storage layer, including MVCC, concurrency patterns, WAL, recovery, DDL operations, index/constraint management, delta chains, and skip list operations. Invoke for pull requests or changes to src/storage/v2/.
doris-repo-review
Review an Apache Doris PR from a local clone with the same multi-agent, shared-ledger convergence workflow as the CI Code Review Runner. Use when the user supplies a PR to /doris-repo-review, asks to review a Doris PR locally, or asks for the CI-style review flow. Safely align only the current worktree to the exact PR…