Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/arcayne/agentic-delivery-playbook/pinpx skills add arcayne/agentic-delivery-playbook --skill pigit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/arcayne/agentic-delivery-playbookWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/arcayne/agentic-delivery-playbook/pi)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arcayne/agentic-delivery-playbook/pi"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arcayne/agentic-delivery-playbook/pi.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.05998 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.02999 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.01200 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00600 |
Grade A, and why
agentic-delivery-playbook scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 548 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agentic Delivery Playbook for Pi
Use this skill to make coding-agent work smaller, safer, and easier to review.
This skill is the policy layer for Pi delivery. It should coordinate Pi primitives instead of replacing them:
agentic-delivery-playbook = triage, scope, approval, evidence policy
pi-goal-x = durable lifecycle for broad/long-running work
pi-subagents = scoped implementation and review lanes
run artifacts = evidence trail only when useful
This is a value gate, not ceremony. If applying the playbook will not change the next action, skip it and implement directly.
The value test
Use the playbook only when it will do at least one of these things:
- narrow a vague request into a concrete goal and non-goals
- stop risky work before implementation for human approval
- define acceptance criteria and validation evidence before coding
- prevent model/agent routing claims that are not actually true
- split broad work into bounded implementation tasks
- create reviewable closeout evidence for a PR or future agent run
- coordinate a Pi goal, worker, reviewer, or planner without losing parent ownership
If none of those apply, say Mode: Direct, make the smallest safe edit, validate, and report evidence.
What this skill is not
- Not a mandatory spec-first workflow for every task.
- Not a requirement to create run artifacts for small edits.
- Not a hard-coded model benchmark or vendor policy.
- Not permission to launch a subagent swarm.
- Not a replacement for Pi goal lifecycle or subagent orchestration.
- Not evidence that a model was used unless Pi actually routed that model and the run recorded it.
Native Pi delivery shape
Use the smallest combination of Pi primitives that makes the work safer:
| Mode | Pi goal | Subagents | Artifacts | Default owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | No | No | No | parent implements |
| Lightweight | Usually no | Optional focused reviewer or worker | Compact checklist/spec only if useful | parent, or worker when separation helps |
| Full | Recommended, especially if long-running/broad | Yes by default: worker for implementation, reviewer for QA; planner/scout when useful | Yes | parent orchestrates, worker writes |
| User says “goal”, “work until done”, or asks for durable progress | Yes | As needed | Yes | goal lifecycle owns stop/complete |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 548 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A c3bc83c27ddf
agentic-delivery-playbook is a skill published in the GitHub repository arcayne/agentic-delivery-playbook (10 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 5,998 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
beautify-with-pingfusi
Beautify or redesign an existing website through iterative pingfusi review rounds with a real human reviewer. Use when asked to "beautify this website," "make this page look professional," "polish this UI/design," "improve the visual design," or finish an AI-built page when there is no reference site to match. Do not…
review-video-with-pingfusi
Have any video reviewed by a real human, through iterative pingfusi review rounds. Use when asked to "review this video", "check the rendered video", "does this video match the prompt/brief", "what do people think of this ad/trailer/demo", or after rendering a Remotion composition or AI-generated clip that no test can…
fix-with-pingfusi
Fix or polish an existing website clone/draft using pingfusi review rounds. Use when the user says "fix it with pingfusi", "polish this clone", "make this match the original", or asks to finish/verify a draft built by any tool (ditto, lovable, v0, hand-written) until the review passes.
pixel-perfect-clone
Clone, copy, or replicate a website/page pixel-perfect using pingfusi. Use when the user asks to clone a site or page with pingfusi, copy a webpage's design, replicate a page, or make a pixel-perfect copy of a URL. Drives the full enforced pipeline - capture, numeric gates, behavior reproduction, and review rounds…
pingfusi-review
Use Pingfusi proactively whenever a coding agent reaches a question it cannot settle with code, automated tests, documentation or search, or a local browser and needs real human judgment or real-world verification. Trigger even when the user does not mention Pingfusi for subjective choices about copy, design, clarity…
owasp-reviewer-prompt
A paranoid OWASP-Top-10-aware system prompt for AI code review that traces data flow, treats every input as malicious, maps each finding to an OWASP category, and outputs a structured Summary / Findings / Severity / Score block reviewers can act on.