Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/archieindian/openclaw-superpowers/pull-request-feedback-loopnpx skills add ArchieIndian/openclaw-superpowers --skill pull-request-feedback-loopgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ArchieIndian/openclaw-superpowersWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/archieindian/openclaw-superpowers/pull-request-feedback-loop)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/archieindian/openclaw-superpowers/pull-request-feedback-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/archieindian/openclaw-superpowers/pull-request-feedback-loop.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00506 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00253 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00101 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00051 |
Grade A, and why
pull-request-feedback-loop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 64 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 98043b7a70ff
pull-request-feedback-loop is a skill published in the GitHub repository ArchieIndian/openclaw-superpowers (71 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 506 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
email-triage
Classify incoming emails into triage categories using content analysis, sender profile memory, and thread detection. Produces a category (URGENT, REPLYNEEDED, FYI, NEWSLETTER, NOTIFICATION, SPAM) with confidence and reasoning.
database-verification
Shell-based database connectivity and integrity checks. Verifies that databases are reachable, schemas match expectations, and data integrity constraints hold.
environment-diagnostics
Environment variable validation and configuration verification. Checks that required variables are set, config files parse correctly, ports are available, and system dependencies meet version requirements.
kubernetes
Diagnose and fix Kubernetes pods, services, networking, storage, and rollout failures with kubectl. Safety-first, read-only by default.
prompt-craft
Translate natural language image descriptions into detailed, structured DALL-E prompts with subject, style, composition, lighting, and mood specifications.
reply-composer
Draft context-aware email replies that match sender tone, reference thread history, and follow the user's style preferences. Presents drafts for review before sending.