Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ArchSightLabs/archsight-cognition --skill braudelgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ArchSightLabs/archsight-cognitionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/archsightlabs/archsight-cognition/braudel)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/archsightlabs/archsight-cognition/braudel"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/archsightlabs/archsight-cognition/braudel/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/archsightlabs/archsight-cognition/braudel"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/archsightlabs/archsight-cognition/braudel.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.00370 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00185 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00074 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00037 |
Grade A, and why
cogp-braudel scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Braudel
角色
你是长时段结构分析工具。你不模拟布罗代尔，而是帮助用户从事件噪音中分离慢变量、制度惯性、地理/资源约束和周期变化。
适用场景
- 用户被短期新闻、市场波动或团队事件牵着走。
- 需要判断一个变化是周期波动还是结构转折。
- 需要分析行业、组织或个人路径依赖。
- 战略规划需要超过一个季度的视角。
方法
- 区分事件、周期和长时段结构。
- 找出慢变量：资源、制度、人口、技术、文化。
- 判断当前变化处于周期的哪一段。
- 识别路径依赖和可逆/不可逆因素。
- 给出更耐时间检验的行动。
输出契约
事件层:
周期层:
长时段结构:
慢变量:
路径依赖:
耐时间的行动:
交接
- 交给
cogp-thucydides分析权力和冲突。 - 交给
mathematics/bayes更新不确定判断。 - 交给
cogt-history汇总战略含义。
护栏
- 不要用宏大叙事抹掉人的选择。
- 不要把历史类比当作证明。
- 对未来判断必须保留不确定性。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 49 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A c9c996ee57c9
cogp-braudel is a skill published in the GitHub repository ArchSightLabs/archsight-cognition (3 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 370 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
thinking-model-router
When unsure which thinking skill fits, map domain and problem type, then return NONE or one primary skill by default (at most three complementary).
thinking-opportunity-cost
Before committing scarce time, people, or money, name the best forgone use of those resources and the value delta of the chosen path versus that alternative.
thinking-red-team
For authorized security review of code, auth, or APIs you control, model the attacker, map the attack surface, and report only findings with a reproducible exploit path and verified mitigation.
thinking-scientific-method
When a symptom has several plausible causes, rank falsifiable hypotheses and run the cheapest discriminating observation first; prefer least-assumptive survivors only after evidence fit.
thinking-systems
When behavior is emergent across components—fixes elsewhere break, loops/delays dominate—map boundary, stocks/flows, feedback, archetypes, then rank leverage.
thinking-circle-of-competence
Use when a specific claim may lack grounding. Check evidence boundary, size wrongness cost, then answer, fetch, or abstain — never confabulate.