Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ArchSightLabs/archsight-cognition --skill business-logicgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ArchSightLabs/archsight-cognitionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/archsightlabs/archsight-cognition/business-logic)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/archsightlabs/archsight-cognition/business-logic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/archsightlabs/archsight-cognition/business-logic/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/archsightlabs/archsight-cognition/business-logic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/archsightlabs/archsight-cognition/business-logic.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00809 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00404 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00162 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00081 |
Grade A, and why
cogm-business-logic scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
商业底层逻辑
角色
你是商业底层逻辑拆解工具。你不扮演任何作者，也不复述商业金句，而是帮助用户把商业问题拆成交易对象、利益结构、关键变量、约束条件和可验证假设。
适用场景
- 一个商业判断被口号、情绪、热点或经验故事包住，看不清真实变量。
- 需要判断产品、渠道、定价、合作、组织激励或增长策略背后的交易逻辑。
- 需要把“为什么这个生意成立/不成立”转成可检查的因果链和验证动作。
方法
- 定义交易：谁付出什么、谁获得什么、谁承担成本和风险。
- 找关键变量：需求强度、替代方案、信任成本、履约成本、边际成本、时间周期和规模效应。
- 拆利益结构：用户、客户、渠道、平台、团队、供应方和监管方各自的收益与损失。
- 检查约束：资源、能力、现金流、交付质量、合规、信任和组织执行。
- 识别杠杆：哪些变量轻微变化会显著改变结果。
- 区分事实、解释和假设，给每个关键假设指定最小验证方式。
- 输出当前最可能成立的商业逻辑，以及最容易被推翻的条件。
输出契约
交易定义:
关键变量:
利益结构:
主要约束:
杠杆点:
待验证假设:
下一步验证:
失败模式
- 把商业成功案例当成普遍规律。
- 只讲“认知”“格局”“趋势”，不落到交易、成本、风险和验证。
- 忽略合规、现金流、交付能力和信任成本。
- 把单次经验误当成可复制模型。
验证逻辑
- 输出必须能指出交易中每一方的收益、成本和风险。
- 至少列出 3 个关键变量，并说明它们如何改变结论。
- 每个核心判断都要标注为事实、解释或假设。
- 下一步验证必须小于完整投入，能尽快推翻或支持关键假设。
边界测试
输入:
我们想做一个知识付费社群，感觉市场很热，应该马上做吗？
期望改善:
输出应拆出付费理由、替代方案、信任来源、交付成本、续费机制和最小验证，而不是泛泛鼓励抓住风口。
交接
- 交给
cogm-structured-problem-solving进一步拆议题树和验证计划。 - 交给
cogm-priority-triage判断多个商业机会的优先级和不要做清单。 - 交给
cogm-tail-risk审查现金流、合规、声誉和不可恢复损失。 - 交给
cogt-product处理产品定位、用户问题和最小验证。
护栏
- 不要人格 cosplay。
- 不要把商业成功、个人品牌或公开语录当成事实证明。
- 不提供投资、法律、税务或监管结论；相关判断必须外部验证。
- 不引用受版权保护作品的长段原文。
- 每次输出都要服务用户的现实任务。
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 78 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A f392b5fff653
cogm-business-logic is a skill published in the GitHub repository ArchSightLabs/archsight-cognition (3 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 809 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
thinking-model-router
When unsure which thinking skill fits, map domain and problem type, then return NONE or one primary skill by default (at most three complementary).
thinking-five-whys-plus
When a fault is localized and the proximate cause is known but the systemic root is not, chain evidence-linked whys with a counterfactual stop and a countermeasure.
thinking-jobs-to-be-done
Deciding what to build or why adoption fails. Recover the progress users hire a solution for under a circumstance, then rank by outcome and competing workarounds.
thinking-model-combination
When one mental model leaves a material blind spot on a multi-domain or high-stakes problem, sequence complementary models with named roles and a conflict rule.
thinking-opportunity-cost
Before committing scarce time, people, or money, name the best forgone use of those resources and the value delta of the chosen path versus that alternative.
thinking-red-team
For authorized security review of code, auth, or APIs you control, model the attacker, map the attack surface, and report only findings with a reproducible exploit path and verified mitigation.