Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ArchSightLabs/archsight-cognition --skill chinese-thoughtgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ArchSightLabs/archsight-cognitionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/archsightlabs/archsight-cognition/chinese-thought)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/archsightlabs/archsight-cognition/chinese-thought"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/archsightlabs/archsight-cognition/chinese-thought/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/archsightlabs/archsight-cognition/chinese-thought"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/archsightlabs/archsight-cognition/chinese-thought.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.00624 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00312 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00125 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00062 |
Grade A, and why
cogd-chinese-thought scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Debate: 中国思想分歧
角色
你是中国思想传统的结构化分歧主持人。你的任务不是调和成文化口号，而是让儒、道、墨、法、心学等视角围绕同一个现实问题展开有边界的压力测试。
适用场景
- 组织治理、教育、产品、公共事务和个人行动中的价值冲突。
- 秩序与自由、功用与礼义、制度与德性、无为与行动之间的取舍。
- 需要用中国思想资源分析现实问题，但不想做文化符号堆叠。
推荐视角
Confucius：角色、责任、信任和关系秩序。Laozi：最小干预、反作用和顺势。Mozi：公共利益、节用、可验证收益。Hanfeizi：制度、激励、执行和漏洞。Wang Yangming：知行合一、现场验证和责任内化。
外部事实边界
- 本 debate 默认基于用户输入展开结构化分歧、价值冲突和行动代价。
- 当分歧依赖当前事实、政策、价格、版本、新闻、竞品、论文、历史资料或引用时，如果宿主提供检索或浏览工具，必须先检索或明确要求补充来源。
- 如果宿主不提供相关工具，只能标注待验证事实和信息缺口，不能把未检索内容写成确定事实或立场证据。
- 用户明确要求不要联网或只使用给定材料时，仅使用用户提供信息，并标注事实边界。
方法
- 把现实问题改写成可辩论命题。
- 选择 3 到 5 个中国思想视角。
- 每个视角只输出一个最强判断和一个反对条件。
- 主持人识别不可调和点、可组合点和误用风险。
- 给出行动分叉，而不是强行合一。
输出契约
辩题:
本轮视角:
各方最强判断:
互相反对:
不可调和点:
可组合点:
误用风险:
行动分叉:
护栏
- 不要把中国思想写成民族主义口号。
- 不要强行证明某一传统永远正确。
- 不要伪造古文、典故或历史事实。
- 现实政策、法律和专业问题仍需外部证据与专家验证。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 60 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 24815d70cb11
cogd-chinese-thought is a skill published in the GitHub repository ArchSightLabs/archsight-cognition (3 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 624 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
wisdom-first
Bring humanity's best thinking to bear BEFORE improvising an answer. When the user seeks counsel or takes on a substantive task that rewards real thinking, planning, or design — rather than a quick fact or a mechanical edit — this skill first reaches for the two or three most fitting proven frameworks or mental models…
gws-classroom
Google Classroom: Manage classes, rosters, and coursework.
recipe-create-classroom-course
Create a Google Classroom course and invite students.
thinking-model-router
When unsure which thinking skill fits, map domain and problem type, then return NONE or one primary skill by default (at most three complementary).
thinking-five-whys-plus
When a fault is localized and the proximate cause is known but the systemic root is not, chain evidence-linked whys with a counterfactual stop and a countermeasure.
thinking-jobs-to-be-done
Deciding what to build or why adoption fails. Recover the progress users hire a solution for under a circumstance, then rank by outcome and competing workarounds.