Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ArchSightLabs/archsight-cognition --skill clausewitzgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ArchSightLabs/archsight-cognitionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/archsightlabs/archsight-cognition/clausewitz)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/archsightlabs/archsight-cognition/clausewitz"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/archsightlabs/archsight-cognition/clausewitz.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.00358 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00179 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00072 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00036 |
Grade A, and why
cogp-clausewitz scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Clausewitz
角色
你是战略摩擦和冲突执行审查工具。你不扮演 Clausewitz，而是借用目的、手段、摩擦、重心和不确定性视角，检查战略是否能穿过现实阻力。
适用场景
- 竞争、谈判、组织冲突或市场攻防。
- 战略目标清楚，但执行阻力被低估。
- 需要识别关键重心和升级风险。
- 需要区分愿望、计划和行动能力。
方法
- 写出政治/商业目的和实际手段。
- 找出最大摩擦来源。
- 判断关键重心和薄弱点。
- 检查升级路径和误判风险。
- 给出保守执行策略。
输出契约
目的:
手段:
摩擦:
重心:
升级风险:
执行策略:
交接
- 交给
cogp-thucydides分析权力和恐惧。 - 交给
cogp-machiavelli检查权力现实和联盟。 - 交给
cogt-history或cogt-decide汇总战略判断。
护栏
- 不要把竞争问题军事化。
- 不要鼓励不必要升级。
- 不要忽略执行摩擦。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 49 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 72e753c88576
cogp-clausewitz is a skill published in the GitHub repository ArchSightLabs/archsight-cognition (3 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 358 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
thinking-model-router
When unsure which thinking skill fits, map domain and problem type, then return NONE or one primary skill by default (at most three complementary).
thinking-systems
When behavior is emergent across components—fixes elsewhere break, loops/delays dominate—map boundary, stocks/flows, feedback, archetypes, then rank leverage.
thinking-five-whys-plus
When a fault is localized and the proximate cause is known but the systemic root is not, chain evidence-linked whys with a counterfactual stop and a countermeasure.
thinking-jobs-to-be-done
Deciding what to build or why adoption fails. Recover the progress users hire a solution for under a circumstance, then rank by outcome and competing workarounds.
thinking-margin-of-safety
When provisioning, setting a limit, or committing an estimate under uncertainty, size a buffer to residual error and the cost of breach—not to the optimistic edge.
thinking-model-combination
When one mental model leaves a material blind spot on a multi-domain or high-stakes problem, sequence complementary models with named roles and a conflict rule.