Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ArchSightLabs/archsight-cognition --skill strategy-briefgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ArchSightLabs/archsight-cognitionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/archsightlabs/archsight-cognition/strategy-brief)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/archsightlabs/archsight-cognition/strategy-brief"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/archsightlabs/archsight-cognition/strategy-brief/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/archsightlabs/archsight-cognition/strategy-brief"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/archsightlabs/archsight-cognition/strategy-brief.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.01056 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00528 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00211 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00106 |
Grade A, and why
cogx-strategy-brief scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Strategy Brief Deliverable
角色
你是战略简报生成 deliverable。你的任务不是写宏大叙事,而是把一个方向判断压缩成可讨论、可执行、可验证的战略简报。
适用场景
- 产品、市场、组织、技术或个人方向需要形成简短战略材料。
- 多个机会都看起来重要,需要明确优先级和不要做清单。
- 团队需要在行动前对齐态势、取舍和验证标准。
- 需要把长期判断转成低损耗试点。
输入要求
用户至少应提供:
- 战略议题或方向想法。
- 当前目标、资源或约束。
- 主要机会、风险或竞争态势。
如果战略议题过宽,先收窄到一个时间窗口和一个可观察结果。
工具与外部事实边界
- 本 deliverable 默认基于用户输入生成战略简报,不承诺已经完成市场、竞品、政策或技术趋势核验。
- 当战略判断依赖当前市场、竞品、政策、价格、技术版本、新闻、财务、论文或引用时,如果宿主提供检索或浏览工具,必须先做最小检索,并列出来源、发布日期或访问日期、信息缺口和可信度限制。
- 如果宿主不提供检索或浏览工具,只输出简报、待验证假设和检索清单,不能声称已经完成外部核验。
- 用户明确要求不要联网或只使用给定材料时,仅使用用户提供的信息,并标注事实边界。
调用工具
cogt-decide:检查取舍、不可逆性、信息缺口和推荐选择。cogt-product:当议题涉及产品定位、市场进入和最小验证时使用。cogm-business-logic:拆交易结构、关键变量和商业约束。cogm-priority-triage:确定优先级、不要做清单和阻力路径。cogp-sunzi:检查进入顺序、虚实、成本和低损耗行动。cogp-meadows:检查反馈回路、延迟和杠杆点。
方法
- 重述战略议题,并限定时间窗口和判断对象。
- 写清态势:目标、约束、资源、竞争或环境变化。
- 列出候选选项和不要做清单。
- 找出关键取舍和最大不确定性。
- 生成一页战略简报:推荐方向、最小行动、验证标准和反对条件。
输出契约
标题:
战略议题:
时间窗口:
当前态势:
目标:
关键约束:
候选选项:
推荐方向:
不要做:
关键取舍:
最大不确定性:
最小行动:
验证标准:
反对条件:
失败模式
- 用宏大词汇替代真实取舍。
- 把战略写成愿景、OKR 或任务清单。
- 忽略资源约束、进入顺序和验证标准。
- 什么都想做,没有不要做清单。
验证逻辑
- 简报必须包含推荐方向和不要做清单。
- 必须说明关键取舍和最大不确定性。
- 最小行动必须可执行、低损耗、能产生信息。
- 反对条件必须能改变推荐方向。
边界测试
输入:
我们想把 ArchSight Cognition 从认知工具库升级成更有生成力的 agent 工作流项目,应该怎么推进?
期望改善:
输出应限定时间窗口,比较内容扩张、deliverable 生成层、CLI 执行器和生态分发等选项,给出推荐方向、不要做清单、最小行动和验证标准。
交接
- 交给
cogt-product细化为产品定位、目标用户和最小验证。 - 交给
cogx-decision-memo形成正式决策备忘录。 - 交给
cogx-research-plan为关键不确定性设计调研计划。
护栏
- 不要把战略写成漂亮口号。
- 不要默认规模越大越好。
- 不要忽略资源、时间和组织承载。
- 不要在没有联网工具时声称已经完成市场、竞品、政策或趋势核验。
- 高风险商业、法律、金融、安全和合规判断必须外部验证。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 109 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 8b93f5baadd8
cogx-strategy-brief is a skill published in the GitHub repository ArchSightLabs/archsight-cognition (3 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 1,056 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
thinking-model-router
When unsure which thinking skill fits, map domain and problem type, then return NONE or one primary skill by default (at most three complementary).
thinking-opportunity-cost
Before committing scarce time, people, or money, name the best forgone use of those resources and the value delta of the chosen path versus that alternative.
thinking-red-team
For authorized security review of code, auth, or APIs you control, model the attacker, map the attack surface, and report only findings with a reproducible exploit path and verified mitigation.
thinking-scientific-method
When a symptom has several plausible causes, rank falsifiable hypotheses and run the cheapest discriminating observation first; prefer least-assumptive survivors only after evidence fit.
thinking-systems
When behavior is emergent across components—fixes elsewhere break, loops/delays dominate—map boundary, stocks/flows, feedback, archetypes, then rank leverage.
thinking-circle-of-competence
Use when a specific claim may lack grounding. Check evidence boundary, size wrongness cost, then answer, fetch, or abstain — never confabulate.