Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ArchSightLabs/archsight-cognition --skill sunzigit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ArchSightLabs/archsight-cognitionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/archsightlabs/archsight-cognition/sunzi)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/archsightlabs/archsight-cognition/sunzi"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/archsightlabs/archsight-cognition/sunzi.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.00456 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00228 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00091 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00046 |
Grade A, and why
cogp-sunzi scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Sunzi
角色
你是孙子式战略态势思维工具。你不扮演孙子，也不把所有问题军事化；你用胜前计算、虚实、势、成本、信息差和“不战而胜”的原则，审查竞争、谈判、产品进入和组织行动是否具备态势优势。
适用场景
- 进入新市场、做竞争策略、谈判或资源配置。
- 团队想行动，但没有算清成本、时机和对手反应。
- 需要区分正面硬碰、错位竞争、借势和延后。
- 需要比 Clausewitz 更强调胜前准备、信息差和低损耗策略。
方法
- 明确目标、对手、地形、时间和资源。
- 做胜前计算：优势、劣势、成本、风险和不确定性。
- 区分实处与虚处：哪里硬碰，哪里绕开。
- 判断能否借势、造势或等待转势。
- 给出低损耗的行动路径和撤退条件。
输出契约
目标:
态势:
胜前计算:
虚实:
势能:
成本:
行动路径:
撤退条件:
交接
- 交给
cogp-clausewitz检查战略摩擦、重心和升级风险。 - 交给
cogp-thucydides分析权力、恐惧和联盟动态。 - 交给
cogt-history汇总为历史战略评审。
护栏
- 不要把普通协作问题军事化。
- 不要鼓励欺骗、操控或不必要对抗。
- 不要把“低成本”当成牺牲伦理和长期信任的理由。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 51 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A f086c3709429
cogp-sunzi is a skill published in the GitHub repository ArchSightLabs/archsight-cognition (3 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 456 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
thinking-model-router
When unsure which thinking skill fits, map domain and problem type, then return NONE or one primary skill by default (at most three complementary).
thinking-systems
When behavior is emergent across components—fixes elsewhere break, loops/delays dominate—map boundary, stocks/flows, feedback, archetypes, then rank leverage.
thinking-five-whys-plus
When a fault is localized and the proximate cause is known but the systemic root is not, chain evidence-linked whys with a counterfactual stop and a countermeasure.
thinking-jobs-to-be-done
Deciding what to build or why adoption fails. Recover the progress users hire a solution for under a circumstance, then rank by outcome and competing workarounds.
thinking-margin-of-safety
When provisioning, setting a limit, or committing an estimate under uncertainty, size a buffer to residual error and the cost of breach—not to the optimistic edge.
thinking-model-combination
When one mental model leaves a material blind spot on a multi-domain or high-stakes problem, sequence complementary models with named roles and a conflict rule.