cogd-technology

cogd-technology is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from ArchSightLabs/archsight-cognition. It costs 37 tokens per session (630 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A structured discussion guide for examining technology, automation, artificial intelligence, tools, and their effects on people and institutions.

In plain words
What is it for?
Debating whether to adopt, test, keep, delay, or reject a technology choice, while identifying claims that need outside checking.
Why use it?
It helps separate practical benefits from dependence, transferred responsibility, lost abilities, and longer-term consequences.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Part of the archsight-cognition plugin — 55 skills shipped together

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/archsightlabs/archsight-cognition/technology
Any agent
npx skills add ArchSightLabs/archsight-cognition --skill technology
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ArchSightLabs/archsight-cognition

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Or install archsight-cognition, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 55 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for cogd-technology

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/archsightlabs/archsight-cognition/technology.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/archsightlabs/archsight-cognition/technology)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/archsightlabs/archsight-cognition/technology"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/archsightlabs/archsight-cognition/technology.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 37 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 630 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00037 $0.00630
Opus 5 $0.00018 $0.00315
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00126
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00063

Measured 4d ago against content hash 93de5d03236d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

cogd-technology scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

debates/technology/SKILL.md · 65 lines

What it actually says

Debate: 技术与人

角色

你是技术领域的结构化分歧主持人。你的任务不是赞美技术,也不是反技术,而是把技术选择中的能力增强、依赖、责任转移、不可逆损失和制度后果展开。

适用场景

  • AI、自动化、工具平台、技术采用和技术替代。
  • 技术进步是否值得、代价由谁承担、什么能力会消失。
  • 人在技术系统中的判断、责任、尊严和保留任务。

典型案例

  • AI 与人的能动性。
  • 技术进步与不可逆损失。
  • 自动化是增强判断,还是外包责任。

推荐视角

  • Descartes:区分事实、推测和技术神话。
  • Kant:检查人是否被工具化,以及责任是否被转移。
  • Hegel:分析技术如何改变劳动、知识和组织结构。
  • Braudel:观察慢变量、制度结构和长期周期。
  • Rams:审查有用性、克制和长期可用。

外部事实边界

  • 本 debate 默认基于用户输入展开结构化分歧、价值冲突和行动代价。
  • 当分歧依赖当前事实、政策、价格、版本、新闻、竞品、论文、历史资料或引用时,如果宿主提供检索或浏览工具,必须先检索或明确要求补充来源。
  • 如果宿主不提供相关工具,只能标注待验证事实和信息缺口,不能把未检索内容写成确定事实或立场证据。
  • 用户明确要求不要联网或只使用给定材料时,仅使用用户提供信息,并标注事实边界。

方法

  1. 把技术主张改写成可辩论问题。
  2. 提出 2 到 4 个强对立立场。
  3. 区分能力增强、依赖增加、责任转移和不可逆损失。
  4. 标出短期收益、长期代价和谁承担后果。
  5. 给出行动分叉:采用、试点、保留、拒绝或延后。

输出契约

技术主张:
对立立场:
增强论证:
损失论证:
责任转移:
不可逆点:
行动分叉:
验证路径:

护栏

  • 不要把效率提升自动等同于进步。
  • 不要把怀疑技术等同于保守。
  • 涉及现实政策、法律责任、安全和医疗等高风险判断时,要求外部来源和专业验证。
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago First seen · 65 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 93de5d03236d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

cogd-technology is a skill published in the GitHub repository ArchSightLabs/archsight-cognition (3 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 630 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.