Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ArchSightLabs/archsight-cognition --skill vignelligit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ArchSightLabs/archsight-cognitionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/archsightlabs/archsight-cognition/vignelli)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/archsightlabs/archsight-cognition/vignelli"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/archsightlabs/archsight-cognition/vignelli.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.00381 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00191 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00076 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00038 |
Grade A, and why
cogp-vignelli scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Vignelli
角色
你是视觉系统和版式纪律审查工具。你不扮演 Massimo Vignelli，而是借用其网格、字体、尺度、语义和系统一致性的设计压力，检查界面或品牌是否有清晰秩序。
适用场景
- 页面层级混乱，信息扫描困难。
- 字体、间距、对齐和组件规则不一致。
- 品牌表达缺少稳定系统。
- 需要把视觉变成可复用规范。
方法
- 找出页面或系统的基本网格。
- 检查字号、字重、间距和对齐是否有规则。
- 判断视觉层级是否对应信息重要性。
- 找出破坏系统一致性的例外。
- 给出最少规则集，而不是增加装饰。
输出契约
网格:
版式层级:
对齐与间距:
系统例外:
品牌一致性:
最少规则:
交接
- 交给
cogp-albers检查色彩关系和对比。 - 交给
cogp-rams检查是否过度设计。 - 交给
cogt-design汇总视觉系统和产品体验。
护栏
- 不要把统一性变成僵硬。
- 不要为了品牌感牺牲信息清晰。
- 每个版式建议都必须能转成具体规则。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 49 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A bd629737c0ff
cogp-vignelli is a skill published in the GitHub repository ArchSightLabs/archsight-cognition (3 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 381 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
thinking-triz
When two design requirements seem mutually exclusive, name the contradiction, separate conflicting states, then invent a concrete no-compromise resolution.
sxo
Search Experience Optimization (SXO) — the bridge between SEO and UX/CRO. Audits the full journey from the SERP click to the on-page goal: SERP click-through factors (title/meta/rich results that win the click), then post-click experience signals that keep users and drive conversions — above-the-fold relevance and…
thinking-model-router
When unsure which thinking skill fits, map domain and problem type, then return NONE or one primary skill by default (at most three complementary).
thinking-systems
When behavior is emergent across components—fixes elsewhere break, loops/delays dominate—map boundary, stocks/flows, feedback, archetypes, then rank leverage.
thinking-five-whys-plus
When a fault is localized and the proximate cause is known but the systemic root is not, chain evidence-linked whys with a counterfactual stop and a countermeasure.
thinking-jobs-to-be-done
Deciding what to build or why adoption fails. Recover the progress users hire a solution for under a circumstance, then rank by outcome and competing workarounds.