Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add arctan303/creator.skill --skill reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/arctan303/creator.skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/arctan303/creator.skill/reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arctan303/creator.skill/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arctan303/creator.skill/reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arctan303/creator.skill/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arctan303/creator.skill/reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00483 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00193 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00097 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00048 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
独立审查
Purpose
发现有证据的契约偏离和回归，帮助关闭真实风险，不扩张为无限审计。
Trigger
R2 或用户明确要求；已授权发布/合并前的相关待复查批次。用户禁用子代理时不绕过约束。
Required context
有效预期与范围、具体风险、相关 diff/文件基线、验证与环境、已知问题、前轮结果、授权/限制和受影响文档。
Workflow
- 相同输入已有运行实例或结果时复用；新输入才审查，指出证据是否仍适用。
- 核验可观察行为与权限/数据等具体影响，不因文件数、Phase 或缺某个模板自动升级。
- 检查受影响需求、现状和计划是否同步，旧决定是否已被替代；不能要求恢复已撤销的约束。 将当前适用性与当时验证结果分开；已撤销能力的未测历史不构成新阻塞，部分仍有效的义务不能被整段取消。
- 首审汇总可执行发现；修复后聚焦原问题和相邻回归。记录关闭/剩余问题与新证据，不按终身轮数禁止验证。
Output
通过/有条件通过/不通过/无法审查/中断；问题附证据、后果及修复方向；验收覆盖、文档差异、证据基线和残余缺口。
Stop or escalate
无实质进展连续两轮或达到已声明预算时暂停，记录恢复条件。无可核验证据时说明缺口；容量/网络失败标中断。不能以换 reviewer 刷通过，不能把自查或用户接受例外写成独立通过。
References
读 stage-contract.md；需要状态与进展细则时读共同契约。
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago Changed · +1 lines · -39 tokens per session d9c75a9ab497
- 1mo ago Changed · -17 lines · -9 tokens per session fdc4c7e99f97
- 1mo ago First seen · 55 lines · 80 tokens per session scan A eba4bda29520
reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository arctan303/creator.skill (19 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 483 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
verify-change
A change-checking skill that reviews code differences and checks whether related documentation, tests, and records were updated.
verify-quality
A code-quality checker that measures complexity, size, naming, and common code smells. It reports problems such as duplicated code, unused code, and overly long functions.
verify-module
A module-checking skill that scans a project’s folders, code, and documentation. It expects each module to include a README.md and DESIGN.md, which explain how the module is used and why it was designed that way.
planning
ONLY for coordinated multi-artifact work: multiple workflows with dependencies, shared data-table schema/migration across tasks, or the user explicitly asked to review a plan first. If workflowbuildercreatetasks is not visible, load it via loadtool (search "create tasks"). Do NOT use for new one-off workflows…
criticism-self-criticism
A structured review method for examining completed work, criticism, and repeated mistakes. It focuses on specific evidence, causes, effects, and practical improvements.
flow-next-spec-completion-review
Verify that a spec's completed tasks fully implement the spec requirements. Use at spec completion before close.