Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ArieGoldkin/ai-agent-hub --skill evidence-verificationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ArieGoldkin/ai-agent-hubWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ariegoldkin/ai-agent-hub/evidence-verification)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ariegoldkin/ai-agent-hub/evidence-verification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ariegoldkin/ai-agent-hub/evidence-verification/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ariegoldkin/ai-agent-hub/evidence-verification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ariegoldkin/ai-agent-hub/evidence-verification.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.03119 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01559 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00624 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00312 |
Grade A, and why
evidence-verification scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 583 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Evidence-Based Verification Skill
Version: 1.0.0 Type: Quality Assurance Auto-activate: Code review, task completion, production deployment
Overview
This skill teaches agents how to collect and verify evidence before marking tasks complete. Inspired by production-grade development practices, it ensures all claims are backed by executable proof: test results, coverage metrics, build success, and deployment verification.
Key Principle: Show, don't tell. No task is complete without verifiable evidence.
When to Use This Skill
Auto-Activate Triggers
- Completing code implementation
- Finishing code review
- Marking tasks complete in Squad mode
- Before agent handoff
- Production deployment verification
Manual Activation
- When user requests "verify this works"
- Before creating pull requests
- During quality assurance reviews
- When troubleshooting failures
Core Concepts
1. Evidence Types
Test Evidence
- Exit code (must be 0 for success)
- Test suite results (passed/failed/skipped)
- Coverage percentage (if available)
- Test duration
Build Evidence
- Build exit code (0 = success)
- Compilation errors/warnings
- Build artifacts created
- Build duration
Deployment Evidence
- Deployment status (success/failed)
- Environment deployed to
- Health check results
- Rollback capability verified
Code Quality Evidence
- Linter results (errors/warnings)
- Type checker results
- Security scan results
- Accessibility audit results
2. Evidence Collection Protocol
## Evidence Collection Steps
1. **Identify Verification Points**
- What needs to be proven?
- What could go wrong?
- What does "complete" mean?
2. **Execute Verification**
- Run tests
- Run build
- Run linters
- Check deployments
3. **Capture Results**
- Record exit codes
- Save output snippets
- Note timestamps
- Document environment
4. **Store Evidence**
- Add to shared context
- Reference in task completion
- Link to artifacts
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 583 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 4e4df9975231
evidence-verification is a skill published in the GitHub repository ArieGoldkin/ai-agent-hub (11 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 3,119 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
neuron-evaluation-engineer
Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.