Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ArieGoldkin/claude-forge --skill prompt-cachinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ArieGoldkin/claude-forgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ariegoldkin/claude-forge/prompt-caching)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ariegoldkin/claude-forge/prompt-caching"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ariegoldkin/claude-forge/prompt-caching/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ariegoldkin/claude-forge/prompt-caching"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ariegoldkin/claude-forge/prompt-caching.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.01745 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00873 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00349 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00175 |
Grade A, and why
prompt-caching scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 217 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Prompt Caching
Cache LLM prompt prefixes for 90% token savings.
Supported Models (2026)
| Provider | Models |
|---|---|
| Claude | Opus 4.1, Opus 4, Sonnet 4.5, Sonnet 4, Sonnet 3.7, Haiku 4.5, Haiku 3.5, Haiku 3 |
| OpenAI | gpt-4o, gpt-4o-mini, o1, o1-mini (automatic caching) |
Claude Prompt Caching
def build_cached_messages(
system_prompt: str,
few_shot_examples: str | None,
user_content: str,
use_extended_cache: bool = False
) -> list[dict]:
"""Build messages with cache breakpoints.
Cache structure (processing order: tools → system → messages):
1. System prompt (cached)
2. Few-shot examples (cached)
─────── CACHE BREAKPOINT ───────
3. User content (NOT cached)
"""
# TTL: "5m" (default, 1.25x write cost) or "1h" (extended, 2x write cost)
ttl = "1h" if use_extended_cache else "5m"
content_parts = []
# Breakpoint 1: System prompt
content_parts.append({
"type": "text",
"text": system_prompt,
"cache_control": {"type": "ephemeral", "ttl": ttl}
})
# Breakpoint 2: Few-shot examples (up to 4 breakpoints allowed)
if few_shot_examples:
content_parts.append({
"type": "text",
"text": few_shot_examples,
"cache_control": {"type": "ephemeral", "ttl": ttl}
})
# Dynamic content (NOT cached)
content_parts.append({
"type": "text",
"text": user_content
})
return [{"role": "user", "content": content_parts}]
Cache Pricing (2026)
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Cache Cost Multipliers (relative to base input price) │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 5-minute cache write: 1.25x base input price │
│ 1-hour cache write: 2.00x base input price │
│ Cache read: 0.10x base input price (90% off!) │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Example: Claude Sonnet 4 @ $3/MTok input
Without Prompt Caching:
System prompt: 2,000 tokens @ $3/MTok = $0.006
Few-shot examples: 5,000 tokens @ $3/MTok = $0.015
User content: 10,000 tokens @ $3/MTok = $0.030
───────────────────────────────────────────────────
Total: 17,000 tokens = $0.051
With 5m Caching (first request = cache write):
Cached prefix: 7,000 tokens @ $3.75/MTok = $0.02625 (1.25x)
User content: 10,000 tokens @ $3/MTok = $0.03000
Total first req: = $0.05625
With 5m Caching (subsequent = cache read):
Cached prefix: 7,000 tokens @ $0.30/MTok = $0.0021 (0.1x)
User content: 10,000 tokens @ $3/MTok = $0.0300
Total cached req: = $0.0321
Savings: 37% per cached request, break-even after 2 requests
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 217 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 7e44b849fb4b
prompt-caching is a skill published in the GitHub repository ArieGoldkin/claude-forge (6 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 1,745 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
prompt-writer
Use when creating, reviewing, or revising prompts, system prompts, developer instructions, agent policies, prompt templates, eval prompts, or skill files consumed by LLMs and AI agents. Routes to OpenAI, Anthropic/Claude, or generic prompt-writing guidance based on the target model/provider.
prompt-engineer
Use this skill when the user explicitly asks to create, write, improve, or optimize a prompt for use with an AI. Trigger on phrases like "write me a prompt", "improve this prompt", "create a system prompt", "how do I ask ChatGPT/Claude to...", or "quero um prompt para...". Do NOT trigger for direct task requests where…
agent-orchestration-improve-agent
Systematic improvement of existing agents through performance analysis, prompt engineering, and continuous iteration.
copilot-sdk
Build agentic applications with GitHub Copilot SDK. Use when embedding AI agents in apps, creating custom tools, implementing streaming responses, managing sessions, connecting to MCP servers, or creating custom agents. Triggers on Copilot SDK, GitHub SDK, agentic app, embed Copilot, programmable agent, MCP server…
prompt-engineering-patterns
Master advanced prompt engineering techniques to maximize LLM performance, reliability, and controllability in production. Use when optimizing prompts, improving LLM outputs, or designing production prompt templates.
ai-prompt-engineering-safety-review
Comprehensive AI prompt engineering safety review and improvement prompt. Analyzes prompts for safety, bias, security vulnerabilities, and effectiveness while providing detailed improvement recommendations with extensive frameworks, testing methodologies, and educational content.