Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Arise-AI-Group/lead-management-plugin --skill contract-managementgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Arise-AI-Group/lead-management-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/arise-ai-group/lead-management-plugin/contract-management)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arise-ai-group/lead-management-plugin/contract-management"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arise-ai-group/lead-management-plugin/contract-management/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arise-ai-group/lead-management-plugin/contract-management"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arise-ai-group/lead-management-plugin/contract-management.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.02088 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01044 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00418 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00209 |
Grade A, and why
contract-management scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 318 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Contract Management
Send contracts for e-signature, track their status in real time, and follow up on unsigned agreements — keeping every deal moving from proposal to signed.
How It Works
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ CONTRACT MANAGEMENT │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ STANDALONE (always works) │
│ ✓ You tell me: client, contract details, status │
│ ✓ Generate contract checklist and signing instructions │
│ ✓ Track contract status manually (sent/viewed/signed) │
│ ✓ Draft follow-up emails for unsigned contracts │
│ ✓ Pipeline status recommendations │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ SUPERCHARGED (when you connect your tools) │
│ + E-signature: Create envelope, send for signing, track events │
│ + CRM: Auto-update pipeline status per signing event │
│ + Chat: Real-time notifications for views, signs, declines │
│ + Email: Send gentle follow-ups for unopened contracts │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Getting Started
Required:
- Client name and company
- What action you need (send contract, check status, follow up on unsigned)
Helpful if you have it:
- Proposal or contract document (PDF or link)
- Signer name and email
- Contract terms (amount, duration, payment schedule)
- When the contract was sent (if checking status)
If CRM is connected, I'll pull client data and contract history automatically.
Connectors (Optional)
| Connector | What It Adds |
|---|---|
| ~~e-signature | Create envelopes, set signature fields, send for signing, check status |
| ~~CRM | Update pipeline status per signing event, store envelope IDs |
| ~~chat | Real-time notifications for each contract event |
| Send follow-up nudges for unsigned contracts |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 318 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 6e571d3875ea
contract-management is a skill published in the GitHub repository Arise-AI-Group/lead-management-plugin (7 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,088 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…