Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ArisGuimera/MobiAI-Core --skill mobiai-review-codegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ArisGuimera/MobiAI-CoreWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/arisguimera/mobiai-core/mobiai-review-code)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arisguimera/mobiai-core/mobiai-review-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arisguimera/mobiai-core/mobiai-review-code/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arisguimera/mobiai-core/mobiai-review-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arisguimera/mobiai-core/mobiai-review-code.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.01638 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00655 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00328 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00164 |
Grade A, and why
mobiai-review-code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 154 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review Code
Perform a mobile-specific code review, checking for common issues that static analysis tools miss.
When to Use
- User asks for a code review of mobile code changes
- After applying a fix, to self-review before creating a PR
- User shares a diff or PR and asks for feedback
Pre-flight: check the Graph for code structure
The Graph indexes Kotlin/Swift symbols across the repo, so callers of any symbol modified in the diff can be located instantly. Used during Step 3 (Review Checklist) and Step 4 (Verify Test Coverage) to detect call sites and tests that the diff may have missed.
If <repo>/.mobiai/graph/index.json exists:
# Freshness — if "hace Xd" with X ≥ 1, suggest refresh (don't auto-run):
mobiai graph status
# For each symbol modified/renamed in the diff, find callers outside the diff:
mobiai graph callers <SymbolFromDiff>
# If a symbol was renamed or removed, search for stale references:
mobiai graph search <OldSymbolName>
The callers list surfaces call sites that the diff may not have updated — a common source of silent breakage when the PR is partial.
If the index is ≥1 day old:
"El índice del Graph es de hace Xd. Si la rama tiene cambios recientes, considerá
mobiai graph initantes de revisar."
Don't run init autonomously.
If .mobiai/graph/index.json does not exist and the project has .kt or .swift files:
"No veo el índice del Graph. Generalo con
mobiai graph initpara que pueda detectar callers fuera del diff."
Don't run init autonomously.
Skip silently when:
- The project has no Kotlin/Swift files (Flutter or RN-only).
- The diff is purely a config / resource / build-file change.
Workflow
Step 1: Identify the Correct Base Branch
Determine the target branch this change will be merged into:
- If reviewing a PR:
gh pr view --json baseRefName --jq '.baseRefName'— this is the authoritative answer - If the user mentioned a branch: use that branch
- If no PR and no branch mentioned: ask the user "What branch is this being merged into?"
- Only as absolute last resort: default to the repo's default branch via
gh repo view --json defaultBranchRef --jq '.defaultBranchRef.name'
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 154 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 8955d9d8d608
mobiai-review-code is a skill published in the GitHub repository ArisGuimera/MobiAI-Core (490 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 1,638 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
app-store-review
Evaluates code against Apple's App Store Review Guidelines. Use this skill when reviewing iOS, macOS, tvOS, watchOS, or visionOS app code (Swift, Objective-C, React Native, or Expo) to identify potential App Store rejection issues before submission. Triggers on tasks involving app review preparation, compliance…
swift-concurrency-pro
Reviews Swift code for concurrency correctness, modern API usage, and common async/await pitfalls. Use when reading, writing, or reviewing Swift concurrency code.
swiftui-pro
Comprehensively reviews SwiftUI code for best practices on modern APIs, maintainability, and performance. Use when reading, writing, or reviewing SwiftUI projects.
axiom-audit-camera
Use this agent to scan Swift code for camera, video, and audio capture issues including deprecated APIs, missing interruption handlers, threading violations, and permission anti-patterns.
mobile-platform-offline-validate
Review a Lightning Web Component for mobile offline compatibility — the Komaci offline static analyzer that pre-primes the data graph for Salesforce Mobile App Plus and Field Service Mobile App. Produces a finding list with code-level fixes covering inline GraphQL queries in @wire configurations, modern lwc:if /…
review-react-native
Perform a read-only review of React Native and Expo code for cross-platform correctness, lifecycle safety, navigation and deep-link behavior, native configuration, permissions, device storage, list and thread performance, gestures, accessibility, build profiles, and OTA compatibility. Use for pull requests, diffs…