Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ArisGuimera/MobiAI-Core --skill mobiai-review-codegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ArisGuimera/MobiAI-CoreWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/arisguimera/mobiai-core/mobiai-review-code)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arisguimera/mobiai-core/mobiai-review-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arisguimera/mobiai-core/mobiai-review-code/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arisguimera/mobiai-core/mobiai-review-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arisguimera/mobiai-core/mobiai-review-code.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.01638 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00819 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00328 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00164 |
Grade A, and why
mobiai-review-code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 154 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review Code
Perform a mobile-specific code review, checking for common issues that static analysis tools miss.
When to Use
- User asks for a code review of mobile code changes
- After applying a fix, to self-review before creating a PR
- User shares a diff or PR and asks for feedback
Pre-flight: check the Graph for code structure
The Graph indexes Kotlin/Swift symbols across the repo, so callers of any symbol modified in the diff can be located instantly. Used during Step 3 (Review Checklist) and Step 4 (Verify Test Coverage) to detect call sites and tests that the diff may have missed.
If <repo>/.mobiai/graph/index.json exists:
# Freshness — if "hace Xd" with X ≥ 1, suggest refresh (don't auto-run):
mobiai graph status
# For each symbol modified/renamed in the diff, find callers outside the diff:
mobiai graph callers <SymbolFromDiff>
# If a symbol was renamed or removed, search for stale references:
mobiai graph search <OldSymbolName>
The callers list surfaces call sites that the diff may not have updated — a common source of silent breakage when the PR is partial.
If the index is ≥1 day old:
"El índice del Graph es de hace Xd. Si la rama tiene cambios recientes, considerá
mobiai graph initantes de revisar."
Don't run init autonomously.
If .mobiai/graph/index.json does not exist and the project has .kt or .swift files:
"No veo el índice del Graph. Generalo con
mobiai graph initpara que pueda detectar callers fuera del diff."
Don't run init autonomously.
Skip silently when:
- The project has no Kotlin/Swift files (Flutter or RN-only).
- The diff is purely a config / resource / build-file change.
Workflow
Step 1: Identify the Correct Base Branch
Determine the target branch this change will be merged into:
- If reviewing a PR:
gh pr view --json baseRefName --jq '.baseRefName'— this is the authoritative answer - If the user mentioned a branch: use that branch
- If no PR and no branch mentioned: ask the user "What branch is this being merged into?"
- Only as absolute last resort: default to the repo's default branch via
gh repo view --json defaultBranchRef --jq '.defaultBranchRef.name'
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 154 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 8955d9d8d608
mobiai-review-code is a skill published in the GitHub repository ArisGuimera/MobiAI-Core (450 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 1,638 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
accessibility-cleanup
Finds common violations of the Android accessibility API in the Clank App Java code and attempts to address them (e.g. hardcoded state change announcements, missing events, focus moving, assertive live regions, etc).
app-store-review
Evaluates code against Apple's App Store Review Guidelines. Use this skill when reviewing iOS, macOS, tvOS, watchOS, or visionOS app code (Swift, Objective-C, React Native, or Expo) to identify potential App Store rejection issues before submission. Triggers on tasks involving app review preparation, compliance…
swift-concurrency-pro
Reviews Swift code for concurrency correctness, modern API usage, and common async/await pitfalls. Use when reading, writing, or reviewing Swift concurrency code.
swiftui-pro
Comprehensively reviews SwiftUI code for best practices on modern APIs, maintainability, and performance. Use when reading, writing, or reviewing SwiftUI projects.
axiom-audit-camera
Use this agent to scan Swift code for camera, video, and audio capture issues including deprecated APIs, missing interruption handlers, threading violations, and permission anti-patterns.
mobile-platform-offline-validate
Review a Lightning Web Component for mobile offline compatibility — the Komaci offline static analyzer that pre-primes the data graph for Salesforce Mobile App Plus and Field Service Mobile App. Produces a finding list with code-level fixes covering inline GraphQL queries in @wire configurations, modern lwc:if /…