Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/arittr/spectacular/phase-task-verificationnpx skills add arittr/spectacular --skill phase-task-verificationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/arittr/spectacularWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/arittr/spectacular/phase-task-verification)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arittr/spectacular/phase-task-verification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arittr/spectacular/phase-task-verification.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00855 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00428 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00171 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00085 |
Grade A, and why
phase-task-verification scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 93 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Phase Task Verification
When to Use
Invoked by sequential-phase-task and parallel-phase-task after task implementation to create and verify git-spice branch.
Parameters
- RUN_ID: 6-char run ID (e.g., "8c8505")
- TASK_ID: Phase-task (e.g., "1-1")
- TASK_NAME: Short name (e.g., "create-verification-skill")
- COMMIT_MESSAGE: Full commit message
- MODE: "sequential" or "parallel"
The Process
Step 1: Stage and create branch
git add .
gs branch create {RUN_ID}-task-{TASK_ID}-{TASK_NAME} -m "{COMMIT_MESSAGE}"
Step 2: Verify based on MODE
MODE: sequential - Verify HEAD points to expected branch:
CURRENT=$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD)
EXPECTED="{RUN_ID}-task-{TASK_ID}-{TASK_NAME}"
[ "$CURRENT" = "$EXPECTED" ] || { echo "ERROR: HEAD=$CURRENT, expected $EXPECTED"; exit 1; }
MODE: parallel - Detach HEAD (makes branch accessible in parent repo):
git switch --detach
CURRENT=$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD)
[ "$CURRENT" = "HEAD" ] || { echo "ERROR: HEAD not detached ($CURRENT)"; exit 1; }
Rationalization Table
| Rationalization | Why It's Wrong |
|---|---|
| "Verification is optional" | Silent failures lose work |
| "Skip detach in parallel mode" | Breaks worktree cleanup |
| "Branch create errors are obvious" | Silent failures aren't detected until cleanup fails |
| "Detach can happen later" | Cleanup runs in parent repo - branch must be accessible |
| "HEAD verification adds overhead" | <100ms cost prevents hours of lost work debugging |
Error Handling
git add fails:
- No changes to stage: Error is expected - task implementation failed or incomplete
- Check if task was actually implemented
- Verify files were modified in expected locations
- Do NOT continue with branch creation
- Permission issues: Git repository permissions corrupted
- Check file ownership:
ls -la .git - Verify worktree is accessible
- Escalate to orchestrator
- Check file ownership:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 93 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A ddf8ff0de71d
phase-task-verification is a skill published in the GitHub repository arittr/spectacular (20 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 855 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…