Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add arjunprabhulal/devops-skills --skill artifact-managementgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/arjunprabhulal/devops-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/arjunprabhulal/devops-skills/artifact-management)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arjunprabhulal/devops-skills/artifact-management"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arjunprabhulal/devops-skills/artifact-management.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00098 | $0.01273 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00049 | $0.00636 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00255 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00127 |
Grade A, and why
artifact-management scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 108 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Artifact Management
An artifact is the one thing that should never be ambiguous in a delivery pipeline: given a
version or digest, everyone — CI, CD, an engineer debugging an incident six months later — should
be able to retrieve the exact same bytes. The moment an artifact can be overwritten, rebuilt with
a different result, or referenced by a mutable tag like latest, every downstream promise (this
is what passed CI, this is what's in staging, this is what's in prod) becomes unverifiable.
If you can't prove two environments are running the exact same artifact, you can't actually debug the difference between them.
An artifact, once built, is immutable — every later stage promotes it, none of them rebuild it.
1. Build once, promote the same bytes everywhere
Rebuilding "the same" artifact for staging and again for production is the single most common artifact-management mistake, because non-determinism anywhere in the build (unpinned dependency, timestamp embedded in the binary, compiler nondeterminism) means the two builds aren't actually the same thing, and you've now tested one and shipped another. Build exactly once in CI, publish it with an immutable identity, and every later environment pulls that identity — promotion is a metadata operation (retag, update a manifest, flip a pointer), never a rebuild.
- CI builds it once, produces a content-addressed digest.
- Staging and production reference that digest, not a rebuilt equivalent.
- Promotion changes only which environment points at the digest, never the bytes themselves.
Done when: you can diff the digest running in production against the digest that passed CI and they match exactly.
2. Version with immutable, content-derived identifiers
Mutable tags (latest, stable, even a branch name) are conveniences for humans, not identities
a system should depend on — the tag latest points at something different every time someone
pushes. Use a content digest (sha256) or an immutable version (a semver tag that's never reused,
or the git SHA) as the actual reference everywhere automation touches; reserve human-friendly
tags as an alias layered on top, never as the source of truth for a deploy.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 108 lines · 98 tokens per session scan A 04b704dafe2f
artifact-management is a skill published in the GitHub repository arjunprabhulal/devops-skills (3 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 98 tokens to every session and 1,273 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
gke-app-onboarding
Manages GKE application onboarding, covering containerization, deployment manifests, and migration. Use when onboarding or deploying an application to GKE for the first time, or containerizing an app for GKE. Don't use for general GKE cluster administration or upgrades (use gke-basics or gke-upgrades instead).
build-mcpb
This skill should be used when the user wants to "package an MCP server", "bundle an MCP", "make an MCPB", "ship a local MCP server", "distribute a local MCP", discusses ".mcpb files", mentions bundling a Node or Python runtime with their MCP server, or needs an MCP server that interacts with the local filesystem…
google-mobile-ads-android-migrate-to-next-gen
Migrates Android applications from the old, legacy Google Mobile Ads (GMA) SDK (com.google.android.gms:play-services-ads) to the new GMA Next-Gen SDK (com.google.android.libraries.ads.mobile.sdk:ads-mobile-sdk). Provides comprehensive mapping tables for imports, classes, and method signatures to help determine…
google-cloud-solution-guided-gke-ai-migration
Guides the migration of existing AI workloads (Cloud Run, Gemini API, Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform) to self-hosted GKE inference using gcloud and kubectl. Use when the user has an existing AI inference workload (on Cloud Run, the Gemini API, Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, or a custom VM) and wants to move it to…
agent-platform-deploy
Deploy open models or custom weights from Model Garden to Agent Platform endpoints, check the status of an in-progress deployment operation, or clean up resources by undeploying models and deleting endpoints. Use when asked to actively deploy a model, list the Model Garden CATALOG of available models, check if a…
agent-platform-eval-flywheel
Measures and improves the quality of AI models and agents on Google Cloud using the Eval Quality Flywheel methodology. Use when evaluating an agent or model, building an eval dataset, picking or writing evaluation metrics, analyzing failures, comparing results before and after a fix, or when guidance is needed on…