Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Armert-Labs/cursor-plugin --skill cursor-result-handlinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Armert-Labs/cursor-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/armert-labs/cursor-plugin/cursor-result-handling)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/armert-labs/cursor-plugin/cursor-result-handling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/armert-labs/cursor-plugin/cursor-result-handling.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00358 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00179 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00072 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00036 |
Grade A, and why
cursor-result-handling scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Cursor Result Handling
When the helper returns Cursor output:
- Preserve the helper's verdict, summary, findings, and next steps structure.
- For review output, present findings first and keep them ordered by severity.
- Use the file paths and line numbers exactly as the helper reports them.
- Preserve evidence boundaries. If Cursor marked something as an inference, uncertainty, or follow-up question, keep that distinction.
- If there are no findings, say that explicitly and keep the residual-risk note brief.
- If Cursor made edits (a write-capable rescue), say so explicitly. Cursor does not always enumerate touched files; if it does not, you may run
git statusto list them, but note that as a derived list rather than something Cursor reported. - For
cursor:cursor-rescue, do not turn a failed or incomplete Cursor run into a Claude-side implementation attempt. Report the failure and stop. - For
cursor:cursor-rescue, if Cursor was never successfully invoked, do not generate a substitute answer at all. - CRITICAL: After presenting review findings, STOP. Do not make any code changes. Do not fix any issues. You MUST explicitly ask the user which issues, if any, they want fixed before touching a single file. Auto-applying fixes from a review is strictly forbidden, even if the fix is obvious.
- If the helper reports malformed output or a failed Cursor run, include the most actionable stderr lines and stop there instead of guessing.
- If the helper reports that setup or authentication is required, direct the user to
/cursor:setupand do not improvise alternate auth flows.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 21 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A eed42374662b
cursor-result-handling is a skill published in the GitHub repository Armert-Labs/cursor-plugin (3 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 358 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
resolve-plugins
Curate Claude Code skill / MCP / hook picks against live upstream sources and pin them in .claude/settings.json. Adding a process harness (a paired skill set) is an ordinary pick this door handles. Reads stack from docs/techstack.md, workflow signal from docs/overview.md + existing pins, then live-queries six source…
journey-simulation
Use when caller wants to observe how a stranger encounters a flow, artifact, or sandbox — triggers like "simulate a user journey", "test our onboarding / checkout / signup", "will my ICP convert", "how does a cold reader experience this README", "first-time user test", "cognitive walkthrough", or any request to…
check-docs-consistency
Cross-reference project docs for drift, stale references, and contradictions. Outputs timestamped report. Discovers Markdown wherever it lives in the repo.
release
Prepare a version release — bump version files, commit, and tag. Just run /release with no arguments.
super-bootstrap
Public entry for the super-bootstrap pipeline — thin orchestrator. Git-inits if absent, then dispatches /super-bootstrap:harness-bootstrap to install or sync the generic runway (always; the runway self-detects fresh-vs-sync). Checks whether seed docs are substantive: greenfield seeds three GAP cards (overview…
merge
Absorb one or more feature branches into the base branch. Recommends merge vs rebase per branch. On conflict, aborts that branch + surfaces the file list + stops. Resolution out of scope; routes to the harness-named conflict-resolution agent or the user.