Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Arnosdeus/agent-toolkit --skill backend-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Arnosdeus/agent-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/arnosdeus/agent-toolkit/backend-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arnosdeus/agent-toolkit/backend-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arnosdeus/agent-toolkit/backend-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arnosdeus/agent-toolkit/backend-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arnosdeus/agent-toolkit/backend-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.00163 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00065 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00033 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00016 |
Grade A, and why
backend-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Backend Review
Procedure and output
Trace changed requests through validation, authorization, persistence, jobs,
and observability. Report BLOCKER, MAJOR, MINOR, or NOTE findings as
file:line — issue — evidence — remediation, then list tests and coverage gaps.
Review API boundaries, validation, errors, authentication and authorization, database access, transactions, concurrency, caching, jobs and queues, observability, configuration, resilience, performance, security, and tests. Follow repository conventions and framework-specific guidance when present. Separate confirmed defects from risks and recommendations; cite evidence and avoid speculative optimization.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 20 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A c1cc69000498
backend-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Arnosdeus/agent-toolkit (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 163 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
opensrc
Fetch dependency source code to give AI agents deeper implementation context. Use when the agent needs to understand how a library works internally, read source code for a package, fetch implementation details for a dependency, or explore how an npm/PyPI/crates.io package is built. Triggers include "fetch source for"…
ring:migrating-to-lib-observability
Migrating a Lerian Go app off lib-commons observability imports (deprecated shims or removed APIs) to lib-observability via a fixed mapping table, then bumps go.mod and validates the build; ring:backend-go applies the edits. Covers log/zap/runtime/assert, opentelemetry/tracing, HTTP middleware, context helpers, and…
ring:using-lib-streaming
Using lib-streaming, Lerian's producer-only event publication library (Kafka/SQS/RabbitMQ/EventBridge), in two modes. Sweep Mode detects DIY publishers (franz-go, sarama, amqp091, watermill, raw AWS SDK) and re-rolled manifests/breakers. Reference Mode catalogs the Builder/Emitter/Catalog facade. Companion to…
ring:using-lib-systemplane
Using lib-systemplane, the hot-reload runtime-config plane (Postgres LISTEN/NOTIFY or MongoDB change streams), in two modes. Sweep Mode detects DIY config reload (SIGHUP, fsnotify, viper, pgx LISTEN), manual tenant-scoping, hand-built admin CRUD, and v4 residue. Reference Mode catalogs client lifecycle and…
ring:using-lib-observability
Using lib-observability v1.1.0, Lerian's OpenTelemetry foundation (lib-commons, lib-systemplane, lib-streaming depend on it), in two modes. Sweep Mode detects DIY zap/slog logging, raw OTel metrics, hand-rolled redaction, and hard-coded attribute strings. Reference Mode catalogs the log, metrics, zap, redaction, and…
ring:using-outbox
Using the transactional-outbox pattern across lib-streaming (writer) and lib-commons/v5/commons/outbox (repository + relay), in two modes. Sweep Mode detects DIY outbox tables, hand-rolled relay loops, send-and-pray emits, missing WithOutboxTx wrapping, and broker calls inside DB transactions. Reference Mode catalogs…