clist: Skill for Claude Code

Run & verify CLIST changes

The dev service is long-running and hosts runserver + RQ workers. Run commands inside it; don't start a second server.

Choose the narrowest check first, then widen

Reality check on the test suite: CLIST's <app>/tests.py files are mostly stubs (SimpleTest doing assertEqual(1, 1)). Real coverage is near zero, so a green test run is weak evidence of correctness. Treat it as a smoke check that the app imports and the runner works — the real verification is running the actual management command / RQ job / parser in the dev container and inspecting its output. Add real tests alongside new behavior when feasible.

Tests (Django runner; <app>/tests.py):

docker compose exec dev ./manage.py test <app>.tests.SomeTest.test_x   # one test
docker compose exec dev ./manage.py test <app>                          # one app
docker compose exec dev ./manage.py test                                # full suite (broad changes only)

Lint / format (Ruff, config in .ruff.toml, line length 120, double quotes):

mise exec -- ruff check src/path/you/changed.py
mise exec -- ruff format src/path/you/changed.py

Run Ruff from the host through mise. JS/CSS/JSON use Biome (biome.json).

Run a management command (e.g. to exercise a parser or check a job):

docker compose exec dev ./manage.py <command>
docker compose exec dev ./manage.py shell      # quick interactive check

Order of operations after an edit

1. Most specific test for the touched module.
2. If it passes, the app's test group.
3. Full suite only when the change is broad.
4. ruff check (and ruff format) on changed files.
5. Fix root causes, not symptoms. Don't weaken assertions or silence errors to make checks pass.

If a check can't run, say exactly why and give the human the command to run.

When done, report

Which commands ran, their results, what you fixed, and anything left unverified.