Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add arozumenko/sdlc-skills --skill privacy-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/arozumenko/sdlc-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/arozumenko/sdlc-skills/privacy-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arozumenko/sdlc-skills/privacy-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arozumenko/sdlc-skills/privacy-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arozumenko/sdlc-skills/privacy-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arozumenko/sdlc-skills/privacy-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00593 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00296 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00119 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00059 |
Grade A, and why
privacy-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 71 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Privacy & GDPR Analysis
Two analysis passes:
- Privacy 🍪 — Cookie consent, trackers, storage
- GDPR 🇪🇺 — GDPR compliance
Data Sources
Network data — browser_network_requests():
Set-Cookieresponse headers → cookie name, domain, and (from header attributes)HttpOnly/Secure/SameSiteflags- Third-party requests → filter for hosts that don't match the page's own
domain; treat requests to known analytics/tracking domains (Google
Analytics/
gtag, Meta Pixel, Hotjar, Intercom, Segment, Mixpanel, etc.) as tracker evidence, and note whether they fired before any consent interaction was recorded in the snapshot/console timeline
Visual + structural — browser_snapshot() / browser_take_screenshot():
- Cookie/consent banner presence, wording, and button prominence ("Accept all" vs "Reject all")
- Privacy policy link presence and location
Limitation: the factory's Playwright MCP toolset has no browser_evaluate,
so document.cookie values, localStorage/sessionStorage contents, and
window.* tracker globals (window.ga, window.fbq, …) cannot be read
directly. Cookie/tracker findings must be inferred from Set-Cookie headers
and third-party network requests instead — lower confidence accordingly per the
evidence rule (audit-methodology.md), and never claim to have read storage
contents that weren't actually gathered.
Privacy 🍪 — Focus Areas
Look for:
- Missing cookie consent banner
- Tracking requests firing BEFORE consent
- Unclear data collection disclosures
- Missing privacy policy link
- Third-party scripts/requests without notice
- Cookies missing
HttpOnlyorSecureflags (fromSet-Cookieheaders) - Analytics firing without consent
GDPR 🇪🇺 — Focus Areas
Look for:
- No explicit consent before tracking
- Bundled consent without granularity
- No right-to-withdraw mechanism
- Missing data retention disclosures
- Pre-ticked consent boxes
- Unclear privacy notices
See references/gdpr-checklist.md for detailed criteria.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 71 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 7511e45cc999
privacy-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository arozumenko/sdlc-skills (20 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 593 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…