Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add arozumenko/sdlc-skills --skill ux-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/arozumenko/sdlc-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/arozumenko/sdlc-skills/ux-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arozumenko/sdlc-skills/ux-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arozumenko/sdlc-skills/ux-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arozumenko/sdlc-skills/ux-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arozumenko/sdlc-skills/ux-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00471 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00235 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00094 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00047 |
Grade A, and why
ux-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
UI/UX & Page-Type Analysis
Core pass:
- UI/UX 🎨 — General UI patterns, forms, layout, navigation
Supporting passes (when detected):
- GenAI 🤖 — AI/chatbot elements
- Error Messages ⚠️ — Error states and messaging
- Page-type checks — domain-specific UX (see
references/page-types.md)
Data Sources
browser_snapshot() — accessible names/roles/structure: CTA hierarchy,
form labels, tab order, navigation structure.
browser_take_screenshot() — visual layout, spacing/alignment, typography
legibility, information density, and anything the accessibility tree can't
show.
UI/UX 🎨 — Focus Areas
- Unclear CTA hierarchy (which button is primary?)
- Inconsistent spacing/alignment
- Illegible typography
- Form fields without labels/placeholders
- No inline validation
- Confusing navigation
- Broken layouts (overlapping, broken grid)
- Missing empty states
- Overwhelming information density
- Unclear affordances (clickable or not?)
Form Checks
- Labels associated with inputs
- Required fields marked
- Inline error messages
- Success state after submission
- Tab order matches visual order
- Appropriate input types (email, tel, number)
GenAI 🤖
Only when AI elements detected: chatbot failures, loading states, prompt injection risks, missing escalation, no AI disclaimer, broken quick-replies.
Error Messages ⚠️
Only when error states visible: generic messages, exposed stack traces, missing retry mechanisms, no recovery path.
Page-Type Checks
When the screenshot matches a specific page type, read references/page-types.md
for targeted domain-specific checks.
Output
Produce findings in the shared schema — see the qa-auditor audit-methodology.md.
Reference Files
references/page-types.md— page-type specific focus areas
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 73 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A c706250ffdf3
ux-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository arozumenko/sdlc-skills (20 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 471 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
webgl-holographic-foil
A self-contained WebGL2 hero: thin-film interference over a crushed-foil surface whose palette shifts with the viewing angle; move the cursor to tilt the film.
html-ppt-hermes-cyber-terminal
OpenDesign + BYOK: choosing and wiring your own model, hands-on — cost, quality, and the routing decision. Built as a decision-grade AI literacy deck for engineers, IT, applied-AI teams.
html-ppt-taste-brutalist
16:9 HTML deck in tactical-telemetry / CRT-terminal taste. Deactivated-CRT charcoal slides, white-phosphor monospace, hazard-red accent, scanline overlay, ASCII syntax, density over decoration. Distilled from Leonxlnx/taste-skill brutalist-skill (Tactical Telemetry mode).
visual-ralph
Visual Ralph orchestration for frontend UI from generated references, static references, or live URL targets, using $ultragoal with built-in visual verdict and pixel-diff evidence until the implementation matches and leaves a reproducible design system.
accessibility
Consolidated accessibility skill entrypoint for WCAG 2.2, ARIA Authoring Practices, cognitive accessibility, Section 508, EN 301 549, design intent verification, and the Accessibility Planner workflow.
make-resume
A Chinese-language tool for creating editable HTML resumes that can be changed in a browser and printed to PDF. It uses available resume templates when they are installed and otherwise provides a simpler fallback.