claude-resume-kit: Skill for Claude Code

/setup-extract

User input: $ARGUMENTS

Parse $ARGUMENTS:

• File path to a paper (e.g., papers/Smith2024_catalyst.pdf, papers/project_report.tex) → read that file
• Multiple paths separated by spaces → batch mode (process each sequentially)
• Empty → ask the user for the paper path or paste content

---

Startup

1. Read CLAUDE.md — check KB Corrections Log for known issues
2. Read config.md — load Personal Info (to identify user's author position), Provenance Flags
3. Read knowledge_base/extractions/_INVENTORY.md — see what's already extracted, avoid duplicates

If the paper is already in the inventory:

• Show the existing extraction path
• Ask: "This paper is already extracted. Re-extract (overwrite) or skip?"
• Wait for user response before proceeding

---

Phase 1: Read & Understand the Paper

Read the paper using the appropriate method:

• PDF files: Use the Read tool (supports PDF reading)
• .tex source: Read directly — often has more detail than the compiled PDF
• If both exist: Prefer .tex for content extraction, use PDF for figures/tables

While reading, collect:

1. Full title, all authors, year, journal/venue, DOI (if available)
2. The user's position in the author list (first, co-first, second, middle, last, corresponding)
3. Publication status (check config.md Provenance Flags first, then infer: published / under review / draft / internal)
4. All computational methods, experimental techniques, software, and frameworks mentioned
5. Quantitative results — speedups, accuracies, efficiencies, improvements over baselines
6. Novelty claims — "first-ever", "new framework", "novel approach", etc.
7. Collaboration indicators — other groups, institutions, shared resources
8. Funding acknowledgments

Progress: "Reading paper... [title] by [first author] et al., [year]"

---

Phase 2: Clarify User's Role

If the user's contribution is not obvious from the paper (common for multi-author work), ask:

Questions to ask (skip any that are already clear from the paper):

1. "What was your specific contribution? (e.g., all computational work, specific analysis, code development)"
2. "Did you develop any tools, methods, or code used in this paper?"
3. "Were there other groups or institutions involved? What was your group's role?"
4. "Any quantitative results you can personally claim? (e.g., 'I ran all the simulations')"
5. "Is there anything in this paper that should NOT appear on your resume? (e.g., collaborator's experimental data)"