Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ArrowsHQ/arrows-sales-skills --skill arrows-agentic-playbook-buildergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ArrowsHQ/arrows-sales-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/arrowshq/arrows-sales-skills/arrows-agentic-playbook-builder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arrowshq/arrows-sales-skills/arrows-agentic-playbook-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arrowshq/arrows-sales-skills/arrows-agentic-playbook-builder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arrowshq/arrows-sales-skills/arrows-agentic-playbook-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arrowshq/arrows-sales-skills/arrows-agentic-playbook-builder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00228 | $0.15554 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00091 | $0.06222 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00046 | $0.03111 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00023 | $0.01555 |
Grade A, and why
arrows-agentic-playbook-builder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 623 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Most teams don't have a sales playbook they trust: it's in the heads of the best reps, or in a document nobody opens. This skill reads the whole pipeline in depth (deals, calls, email, docs) and writes down how the team actually runs its sales process, so anyone who reads it understands how deals should be run: the leadership team, a rep hired next month, a consultant or agency, and any AI assistant the team uses.
It's two things in one: the basics of the business (what we sell, why customers buy, who we sell to and who we don't) and an SOP of plays: what the team does at each moment ("when a demo is booked", "after the first call") and in each situation (the kinds of buyers and companies that show up in their deals, a competitor coming up, a deal going quiet). Every play uses the same card:
When: the trigger, checkable on a real deal
Who it's for: the kind of buyer or company, or every deal
Goal: what this play is for
Steps: in order, each with an owner and timing
What we say: a line or question from the team's own winning calls and emails
Hand off when: when to bring in a manager, specialist or someone else
Done when: what you can see on the deal
Seen in: how often the team's winning deals did this
The plays come from what the team's winning deals actually did, not from generic sales advice. Where the team has no consistent way of handling a moment yet, the playbook says so as a gap to decide, never an invented play.
| What | Who it's for | What's in it |
|---|---|---|
| The playbook page | Anyone: the team, a new hire, a manager, a consultant | One visual page, the same layout every time: what we sell and why, who we sell to, how we sell at a glance, the plays at a glance, plays by who books, moment by moment, when things happen, pricing and closing, handoffs, how we run the team, what we say, working with AI, gaps to decide |
arrows-sales-playbook.md |
People, and any AI assistant that reads it | The same playbook as a file to load into any AI tool (a Claude project, a ChatGPT project or custom GPT, a Gemini Gem, a Copilot agent), so it helps with every deal the team's way |
It also refreshes the team files setup made (arrows-sales-process.md, arrows-buyers-and-competitors.md) so every Sales Skill works from the same facts. Setup stays the quick start for every rep; this is the deep version of the team's process, usually run by the leader.
| Starting point | What you get |
|---|---|
| No playbook (or "it's in my head") | The page and the playbook file, built from the team's deals, calls, email and docs |
| A playbook already | Every rule in it counted against real deals ("multithread by the demo: 7 of 24"), and the page and file updated, keeping what still holds |
This is the deepest Sales Skill: expect 20–40 minutes of reading, with progress shown as it goes. The person replies twice: once at the start, once to confirm what you found.
Step 1: Find what exists, and ask once
Read the profile files first; they're a head start, not the answer:
arrows-sales-process.md:## Why we win and lose,## Pipeline stages,## Discovery and qualification,## Numbers,## Open questions.arrows-buyers-and-competitors.md:## What we sell and who we sell to,## Pricing and packaging,## Competitors.arrows-how-i-work.md:## About me(rep, leader or both),## What I do on my best deals,## What slips.arrows-how-we-work.md(leaders):## Our team,## Every rep, every deal,## What I want to see weekly.arrows-crm-guide.md(if present):## How deals move,## Required by stage,## Stage evidence,## What to update, when.arrows-sales-playbook.md: built by this skill before. If present and they didn't ask to refresh, offer to refresh, or to check deals against it (Step 2's playbook check, then go straight to the results).
Search connected documents (Google Drive, Notion, Confluence, SharePoint, shared folders) for an existing playbook and its relatives: "playbook", "sales process", "stage definitions", "exit criteria", "qualification", "MEDDIC"/"MEDDPICC"/"SPICED"/"BANT", "discovery questions", "battlecard", "objection", "mutual action plan"/"close plan", "onboarding", "enablement", "talk track", "pitch deck". Note each title, link and last-edited date.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 623 lines · 228 tokens per session scan A c21ae29fe1e9
arrows-agentic-playbook-builder is a skill published in the GitHub repository ArrowsHQ/arrows-sales-skills (5 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 228 tokens to every session and 15,554 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-21.
Other skills, from other repositories
ib_0dte
Find and place the best 0DTE (zero-days-to-expiration) credit spreads from Interactive Brokers. Default execution route is the EMA9/EMA21 + VIX/VXN regime strategy (emavix0dte.py), which auto-selects bullput or bearcall from a bare EMA cross and skips the trade when the vol index is elevated (VXN ≥ 30 for NDX/QQQ, VIX…
ib-pmcc-advisor
Analyze PMCC (Poor Man's Covered Call / diagonal spread) positions from IB portfolio. For each diagonal spread, reports short leg risk (delta, IV, assignment probability), daily P&L projections, top-3 roll candidates, and a side-by-side comparison table. Requires TWS or IB Gateway running locally.
ib-stop-loss
Downside stop-loss management for PMCC, naked LEAPS, and stock positions in IB. Computes stop prices, detects alerts, and places conditional combo orders. Dry-run by default. Requires TWS or IB Gateway running locally.
ib-trades-history
Fetch trade executions from Interactive Brokers filtered by account, date range, or symbol. Supports live API (7 days history) and FlexReport (full history). Use when user asks about their trades, executions, or transaction history. Requires TWS or IB Gateway running locally.
ib-trailing-stop
Server-side trailing stop management for stocks and naked LEAPS in IB. Places native TRAIL orders that auto-ratchet the stop as price climbs. Dry-run by default. Requires TWS or IB Gateway running locally.
scanner-pmcc
Scan stocks for Poor Man's Covered Call (PMCC) suitability. Analyzes LEAPS and short call options for delta, liquidity, spread, IV, yield, trend direction, and earnings proximity. Use when user asks about PMCC candidates, diagonal spreads, or LEAPS strategies.