Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add arrrrny/zuraffa --skill speckit-plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/arrrrny/zuraffaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/arrrrny/zuraffa/speckit-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arrrrny/zuraffa/speckit-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arrrrny/zuraffa/speckit-plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arrrrny/zuraffa/speckit-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arrrrny/zuraffa/speckit-plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.01865 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00746 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00373 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00186 |
Grade A, and why
speckit-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
98% identical to speckit-plan — 6 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 167 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
User Input
$ARGUMENTS
You MUST consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
Pre-Execution Checks
Check for extension hooks (before planning):
- Check if
.specify/extensions.ymlexists in the project root. - If it exists, read it and look for entries under the
hooks.before_plankey - If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that
.specify/extensions.ymlcould not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (optional: false) hooks registered there, then continue normally - Filter out hooks where
enabledis explicitlyfalse. Treat hooks without anenabledfield as enabled by default. - For each remaining hook, do not attempt to interpret or evaluate hook
conditionexpressions:- If the hook has no
conditionfield, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable - If the hook defines a non-empty
condition, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
- If the hook has no
- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (
.) with hyphens (-). For example,speckit.git.commit→/speckit-git-commit. - For each executable hook, output the following based on its
optionalflag:- Optional hook (
optional: true):## Extension Hooks **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension} Command: `/{command}` Description: {description} Prompt: {prompt} To execute: `/{command}` - Mandatory hook (
optional: false):
After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal## Extension Hooks **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension} Executing: `/{command}` EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command} Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Outline.{command}id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as/skill:speckit-...or$speckit-...). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
- Optional hook (
- If no hooks are registered or
.specify/extensions.ymldoes not exist, skip silently
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed c77d361665b3
- 1mo ago Changed 3ba54b3b7b19
- 1mo ago First seen · 167 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 3d13e010accc
speckit-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository arrrrny/zuraffa (5 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 1,865 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 98% identical to speckit-plan, differing in 6 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
flutter
Use when building, structuring, testing or optimizing a Flutter app — feature-first layering, Riverpod 3 or Bloc, typed gorouter, freezed models, a dio data layer, Material 3, jank hunting, widget/golden tests. Targets Flutter 3.44 / Dart 3.12. NOT React Native (that is react-native), NOT Compose Multiplatform (that…
he-plan
Plan a change before implementation, resolve material user decisions and prepare repository-grounded UX references. Use a compact plan for small changes; route large, unclear efforts or explicit Wayfinder requests to Wayfinder. Skip explanation-only requests and execution already covered by a ready, authorized plan.
he-ship
Deliver a verified build through a task branch and PR, check the intended remote result, and clean up the completed task safely. Use for PR creation, shipping, merging or release/deployment requests; skip planning, implementation and review-only work.
he-build
Implement and verify a ready, authorized plan through focused fixes and integrated checks, ending with a ready-for-ship handoff. Use for implementation, bug fixes or resuming build work; skip planning-only, review-only and shipping-only requests.
e2e
Prove real user journeys across browser, mobile, desktop, API and CLI surfaces using the project's existing test tools. Use for end-to-end verification, runtime UI review or requested visual proof.
he-learn
Prevent verified repeated failures and preserve lasting decisions in terse ADRs. Use when failures recur, prevention needs strengthening, or accepted decisions and steering need durable capture; skip ordinary one-off fixes and routine task updates.