Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to artcc/freelingo. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/artcc/freelingo/main/.opencode/skills/run-tests/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/artcc/freelingoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/artcc/freelingo/run-tests)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/artcc/freelingo/run-tests"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/artcc/freelingo/run-tests/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/artcc/freelingo/run-tests"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/artcc/freelingo/run-tests.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.01027 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00411 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00205 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00103 |
Grade A, and why
run-tests scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago Changed · +4 lines 5e3618b80593
- 2mo ago First seen · 101 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A ee72db92b8b0
run-tests is a skill published in the GitHub repository artcc/freelingo (214 stars, last pushed today), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 1,027 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review
Perform a structured code review of changes, checking for correctness, style, tests, and potential issues.
cli-command
Design, implement, or review Composio CLI commands under ts/packages/cli using Effect, effect/cli, services, output conventions, configuration and environment variables, and local vendor references. Use for CLI command UX, command wiring, service changes, or CLI source edits. Do not use for CLI E2E-only work; use…
pytest-suite
Write or extend the backend test suite following this project's conventions. Use when adding tests for a new service/route/repository, when coverage is missing, or when asked to test a feature. Knows the mocked-session + httpx AsyncClient setup so tests run with no database.
red-team-review
Unified adversarial review, two modes. Strategic Matrix v4.3 (MTA-004) for arguments/plans/decisions: Priors → Rubric → Adversarial Lenses → SWOT/TOWS → MCDA → Blind Spot/Kill Switch → Summary. Deliverable Audit for built artefacts (assignments, reports, code outputs): isolated fresh-context hunt against the brief…
factory-self-review
Review and test a Factory work item's pushed branch before any pull or merge request exists, then record the verdict that sends it back to Building or on to open the change request.
hermes-change-review
Use when a branch, pull request, Kanban task, or implementation must be reviewed separately for intent fidelity, repository quality, and verification evidence before completion or merge is accepted.