Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ArtemioPadilla/agent-triforce --skill git-worktreesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ArtemioPadilla/agent-triforceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/artemiopadilla/agent-triforce/git-worktrees)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/artemiopadilla/agent-triforce/git-worktrees"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/artemiopadilla/agent-triforce/git-worktrees/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/artemiopadilla/agent-triforce/git-worktrees"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/artemiopadilla/agent-triforce/git-worktrees.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.00718 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00287 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00144 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00072 |
Grade A, and why
git-worktrees scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 114 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Git Worktrees
Manage an isolated worktree for: $ARGUMENTS
When to Use
- Starting feature implementation (keeps main workspace clean)
- Parallel development (multiple features simultaneously)
- Risky experiments (delete worktree if it fails, main untouched)
- Subagent isolation (agents work in worktree, can't pollute main)
Create Worktree
PROJECT_ROOT="$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)"
PROJECT_NAME="$(basename "$PROJECT_ROOT")"
FEATURE_NAME="{feature-name}" # kebab-case, no spaces
WORKTREE_DIR="../${PROJECT_NAME}-worktrees/feat-${FEATURE_NAME}"
BRANCH_NAME="feat/${FEATURE_NAME}"
git worktree add -b "$BRANCH_NAME" "$WORKTREE_DIR"
cd "$WORKTREE_DIR"
Verify Clean Baseline
After creating the worktree, run the project's test suite:
# Detect and run test command
if [ -f "package.json" ]; then
npm test
elif [ -f "pyproject.toml" ] || [ -f "setup.py" ]; then
pytest
elif [ -f "Cargo.toml" ]; then
cargo test
elif [ -f "go.mod" ]; then
go test ./...
fi
If tests fail: Fix baseline before starting implementation. Do not proceed with a broken baseline.
During Implementation
- All work happens in the worktree directory
- Commit frequently to the feature branch
- Main workspace remains untouched
- Subagents receive the worktree path, not the main project path
Finish Branch
When implementation is complete, present exactly these 4 options:
Implementation complete. What would you like to do?
1. Merge back to {base-branch} locally
2. Push and create a Pull Request
3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later)
4. Discard this work
Option 1: Merge Locally
BASE_BRANCH="main" # or detected base
cd "$PROJECT_ROOT"
git checkout "$BASE_BRANCH"
git pull
git merge "$BRANCH_NAME"
# Verify tests pass on merged result
git branch -d "$BRANCH_NAME"
git worktree remove "$WORKTREE_DIR"
Option 2: Push + Create PR
git push -u origin "$BRANCH_NAME"
gh pr create --title "{title}" --body "## Summary
- {changes}
## Test Plan
- [ ] {verification steps}"
Worktree kept until PR merges.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 114 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 380378ed6c38
git-worktrees is a skill published in the GitHub repository ArtemioPadilla/agent-triforce (3 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 718 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
deploy-landed
A deployment verification procedure that checks whether the intended code revision is actually running, its environment settings are present, and the product works. A deployment is the process of putting new software on a server or hosting platform.
signing-preflight
Before the first commit of a session, check that commit signing will work — the key is loaded and unlocked — and ask the operator to unlock it once, up front, instead of discovering it after a hundred unsigned commits. Never disables signing silently, never re-signs history without asking. Use at the start of…
bump-sdk-version
Bump the FutureSearch SDK version across all files. Use when releasing a new SDK version, updating version numbers, or the user says bump version, release, version bump.
pr-check
PR review compliance: fetch review comments from an open PR, categorize as resolved/unresolved/dismissed, critically evaluate fixable items, implement approved fixes, and reply inline. Pass --unattended to halt on human-judgment items (emitted as Pending-Human) instead of prompting via AskUserQuestion.
babysit
PR babysitter: monitors CI status, auto-rebases when behind, auto-fixes CI where possible, delegates review comment handling to dlc:pr-check, and re-requests review after fixes. Designed for /loop usage with Remote Control.
git-ops
Git hygiene: clean up merged branches, prune stale remotes, and verify repository state.